» Articles » PMID: 27602666

Cord-Blood Transplantation in Patients with Minimal Residual Disease

Abstract

Background: The majority of patients in need of a hematopoietic-cell transplant do not have a matched related donor. Data are needed to inform the choice among various alternative donor-cell sources.

Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we compared outcomes in 582 consecutive patients with acute leukemia or the myelodysplastic syndrome who received a first myeloablative hematopoietic-cell transplant from an unrelated cord-blood donor (140 patients), an HLA-matched unrelated donor (344), or an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (98).

Results: The relative risks of death and relapse between the cord-blood group and the two other unrelated-donor groups appeared to vary according to the presence of minimal residual disease status before transplantation. Among patients with minimal residual disease, the risk of death was higher in the HLA-mismatched group than in the cord-blood group (hazard ratio, 2.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52 to 5.63; P=0.001); the risk was also higher in the HLA-matched group than in the cord-blood group but not significantly so (hazard ratio, 1.69; 95% CI, 0.94 to 3.02; P=0.08). Among patients without minimal residual disease, the hazard ratios were lower (hazard ratio in the HLA-mismatched group, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.76 to 2.46; P=0.30; hazard ratio in the HLA-matched group, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.28; P=0.33). The risk of relapse among patients with minimal residual disease was significantly higher in the two unrelated-donor groups than in the cord-blood group (hazard ratio in the HLA-mismatched group, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.22 to 7.38; P=0.02; hazard ratio in the HLA-matched group, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.34 to 6.35; P=0.007). Among patients without minimal residual disease, the magnitude of these associations was lower (hazard ratio in the HLA-mismatched group, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.51 to 3.25; P=0.60; hazard ratio in the HLA-matched group, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.65 to 2.58; P=0.46).

Conclusions: Our data suggest that among patients with pretransplantation minimal residual disease, the probability of overall survival after receipt of a transplant from a cord-blood donor was at least as favorable as that after receipt of a transplant from an HLA-matched unrelated donor and was significantly higher than the probability after receipt of a transplant from an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor. Furthermore, the probability of relapse was lower in the cord-blood group than in either of the other groups.

Citing Articles

Significance of Measurable Residual Disease in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Gang M, Othus M, Walter R Cells. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 39996762 PMC: 11853423. DOI: 10.3390/cells14040290.


Myeloablative conditioning in cord blood transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia patients is efficacious only until age 55.

Oshima S, Arai Y, Kondo T, Yano S, Hirabayashi S, Uchida N Bone Marrow Transplant. 2025; .

PMID: 39838078 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-025-02508-2.


Relationship between donor source, pre-transplant measurable residual disease, and outcome after allografting for adults with acute myeloid leukemia.

Orvain C, Milano F, Rodriguez-Arboli E, Othus M, Petersdorf E, Sandmaier B Leukemia. 2024; 39(2):381-390.

PMID: 39668236 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-024-02497-z.


Clinical relevance of feto-maternal microchimerism in (hematopoietic stem cell) transplantation.

Kruchen A, Fehse B, Muller I Semin Immunopathol. 2024; 47(1):4.

PMID: 39644358 PMC: 11625077. DOI: 10.1007/s00281-024-01028-3.


Novel conditioning and prophylaxis regimens for relapse prevention.

Mancusi A, Ruggeri L, Pierini A Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2024; 2024(1):627-634.

PMID: 39644026 PMC: 11665651. DOI: 10.1182/hematology.2024000590.


References
1.
Ruggeri A, Michel G, Dalle J, Caniglia M, Locatelli F, Campos A . Impact of pretransplant minimal residual disease after cord blood transplantation for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in remission: an Eurocord, PDWP-EBMT analysis. Leukemia. 2012; 26(12):2455-61. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2012.123. View

2.
Eapen M, Rubinstein P, Zhang M, Stevens C, Kurtzberg J, Scaradavou A . Outcomes of transplantation of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood and bone marrow in children with acute leukaemia: a comparison study. Lancet. 2007; 369(9577):1947-54. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60915-5. View

3.
Marks D, Woo K, Zhong X, Appelbaum F, Bachanova V, Barker J . Unrelated umbilical cord blood transplant for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first and second complete remission: a comparison with allografts from adult unrelated donors. Haematologica. 2013; 99(2):322-8. PMC: 3912963. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2013.094193. View

4.
Anasetti C, Logan B, Lee S, Waller E, Weisdorf D, Wingard J . Peripheral-blood stem cells versus bone marrow from unrelated donors. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367(16):1487-96. PMC: 3816375. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203517. View

5.
Delaney C, Heimfeld S, Brashem-Stein C, Voorhies H, Manger R, Bernstein I . Notch-mediated expansion of human cord blood progenitor cells capable of rapid myeloid reconstitution. Nat Med. 2010; 16(2):232-6. PMC: 2819359. DOI: 10.1038/nm.2080. View