» Articles » PMID: 27600433

Ammonia Deposition in the Neighbourhood of an Intensive Cattle Feedlot in Victoria, Australia

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2016 Sep 8
PMID 27600433
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intensive cattle feedlots are large emission sources of ammonia (NH3), but NH3 deposition to the landscape downwind of feedlots is not well understood. We conducted the first study in Australia to measure NH3 dry deposition within 1 km of a commercial beef cattle feedlot in Victoria. NH3 concentrations and deposition fluxes decreased exponentially with distance away from the feedlot. The mean NH3 concentrations decreased from 419 μg N m(-3) at 50 m to 36 μg N m(-3) at 1 km, while the mean NH3 dry deposition fluxes decreased from 2.38 μg N m(-2) s(-1) at 50 m to 0.20 μg N m(-2) s(-1) at 1 km downwind from the feedlot. These results extrapolate to NH3 deposition of 53.9 tonne N yr(-1) in the area within 1 km from the feedlot, or 67.5 kg N ha(-1) yr(-1) as an area-weighted mean, accounting for 8.1% of the annual NH3-N emissions from the feedlot. Thus NH3 deposition around feedlots is a significant nitrogen input for surrounding ecosystems. Researches need be conducted to evaluate the impacts of NH3 deposition on the surrounding natural or semi-naturals ecosystems and to reduce N fertilizer application rate for the surrounding crops by considering nitrogen input from NH3 deposition.

Citing Articles

The hidden cost of using low-resolution concentration data in the estimation of NH dry deposition fluxes.

Schrader F, Schaap M, Zoll U, Kranenburg R, Brummer C Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):969.

PMID: 29343777 PMC: 5772562. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18021-6.

References
1.
Chen D, Sun J, Bai M, Dassanayake K, Denmead O, Hill J . A new cost-effective method to mitigate ammonia loss from intensive cattle feedlots: application of lignite. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:16689. PMC: 4653648. DOI: 10.1038/srep16689. View

2.
Liu X, Duan L, Mo J, Du E, Shen J, Lu X . Nitrogen deposition and its ecological impact in China: an overview. Environ Pollut. 2010; 159(10):2251-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.08.002. View

3.
Hao X, Chang C, Janzen H, Clayton G, Hill B . Sorption of atmospheric ammonia by soil and perennial grass downwind from two large cattle feedlots. J Environ Qual. 2006; 35(5):1960-5. DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0308. View

4.
Erisman J, Schaap M . The need for ammonia abatement with respect to secondary PM reductions in Europe. Environ Pollut. 2004; 129(1):159-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2003.08.042. View

5.
Pinder R, Adams P, Pandis S . Ammonia emission controls as a cost-effective strategy for reducing atmospheric particulate matter in the Eastern United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2007; 41(2):380-6. DOI: 10.1021/es060379a. View