» Articles » PMID: 27599046

Ultrashort Echo Time Magnetization Transfer (UTE-MT) Imaging and Modeling: Magic Angle Independent Biomarkers of Tissue Properties

Overview
Journal NMR Biomed
Publisher Wiley
Date 2016 Sep 7
PMID 27599046
Citations 52
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

MRI biomarkers such as T , T * and T have been widely used, but are confounded by the magic angle effect. The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of the two-dimensional ultrashort echo time magnetization transfer (UTE-MT) sequence for potential magic angle independent MR biomarkers. Magnetization transfer was investigated in cadaveric Achilles tendon samples using the UTE-MT sequence at five MT powers and five frequency offsets ranging from 2 to 50 kHz. The protocol was applied at five sample orientations ranging from 0 to 90° relative to the B field. The results were analyzed with a two-pool quantitative MT model. Multiple T data were also acquired and mono-exponential T * was calculated for each orientation. Macromolecular proton fractions and exchange rates derived from UTE-MT modeling did not appreciably change between the various orientations, whereas the T * relaxation time demonstrated up to a sixfold increase from 0° to 55°. The UTE-MT technique with two-pool modeling shows promise as a clinically compatible technique that is resistant to the magic angle effect. This method provides information on the macromolecular proton pool that cannot be directly obtained by other methods, including regular UTE techniques.

Citing Articles

UTE MRI technical developments and applications in osteoporosis: a review.

Shin S, Chae H, Suprana A, Jerban S, Chang E, Shi L Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025; 16:1510010.

PMID: 39980853 PMC: 11839439. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1510010.


Quantitative ultrashort echo time MR imaging of knee osteochondral junction: An ex vivo feasibility study.

Athertya J, Suprana A, Lo J, Lombardi A, Moazamian D, Chang E NMR Biomed. 2024; 37(12):e5253.

PMID: 39197467 PMC: 11657415. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.5253.


Significant age-related differences between lower leg muscles of older and younger female subjects detected by ultrashort echo time magnetization transfer modeling.

Jerban S, Shaterian Mohammadi H, Athertya J, Afsahi A, Shojaeiadib N, Moazamian D NMR Biomed. 2024; 37(12):e5237.

PMID: 39155273 PMC: 11786624. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.5237.


Towards assessing and improving the reliability of ultrashort echo time quantitative magnetization transfer (UTE-qMT) MRI of cortical bone: In silico and ex vivo study.

Shin S, Moazamian D, Tang Q, Jerban S, Ma Y, Du J MAGMA. 2024; 37(6):983-992.

PMID: 39126439 PMC: 11582156. DOI: 10.1007/s10334-024-01190-7.


A feasibility study of in vivo quantitative ultra-short echo time-MRI for detecting early cartilage degeneration.

Su X, Wang Y, Chen J, Liang Z, Wan L, Tang G Insights Imaging. 2024; 15(1):162.

PMID: 38922455 PMC: 11208376. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01734-4.


References
1.
Henkelman R, Stanisz G, Graham S . Magnetization transfer in MRI: a review. NMR Biomed. 2001; 14(2):57-64. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.683. View

2.
Zhang J, Nissi M, Idiyatullin D, Michaeli S, Garwood M, Ellermann J . Capturing fast relaxing spins with SWIFT adiabatic rotating frame spin-lattice relaxation (T1ρ) mapping. NMR Biomed. 2016; 29(4):420-30. PMC: 4805510. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3474. View

3.
Hodgson R, Evans R, Wright P, Grainger A, OConnor P, Helliwell P . Quantitative magnetization transfer ultrashort echo time imaging of the Achilles tendon. Magn Reson Med. 2011; 65(5):1372-6. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22715. View

4.
Kim T, Min B, Yoon S, Kim H, Park S, Lee H . An in vitro comparative study of T2 and T2* mappings of human articular cartilage at 3-Tesla MRI using histology as the standard of reference. Skeletal Radiol. 2014; 43(7):947-54. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-014-1872-z. View

5.
Bittersohl B, Hosalkar H, Sondern M, Miese F, Antoch G, Krauspe R . Spectrum of T2* values in knee joint cartilage at 3 T: a cross-sectional analysis in asymptomatic young adult volunteers. Skeletal Radiol. 2014; 43(4):443-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-013-1806-1. View