» Articles » PMID: 27598130

Antimicrobial Resistance Profile of Planktonic and Biofilm Cells of Staphylococcus Aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2016 Sep 7
PMID 27598130
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of the present study was to determine the antimicrobial resistance profile of planktonic and biofilm cells of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). Two hundred Staphylococcus spp. strains were studied, including 50 S. aureus and 150 CoNS strains (50 S. epidermidis, 20 S. haemolyticus, 20 S. warneri, 20 S. hominis, 20 S. lugdunensis, and 20 S. saprophyticus). Biofilm formation was investigated by adherence to polystyrene plates. Positive strains were submitted to the broth microdilution method to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for planktonic and biofilm cells and the minimal bactericidal concentration for biofilm cells (MBCB). Forty-nine Staphylococcus spp. strains (14 S. aureus, 13 S. epidermidis, 13 S. saprophyticus, 3 S. haemolyticus, 1 S. hominis, 3 S. warneri, and 2 S. lugdunensis) were biofilm producers. These isolates were evaluated regarding their resistance profile. Determination of planktonic cell MIC identified three (21.4%) S. aureus strains that were resistant to oxacillin and six (42.8%) that were resistant to erythromycin. Among the CoNS, 31 (88.6%) strains were resistant to oxacillin, 14 (40%) to erythromycin, 18 (51.4%) to gentamicin, and 8 (22.8%) to sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. None of the planktonic isolates were resistant to vancomycin or linezolid. MICs were 2-, 4-, 8-, and up to 16-fold higher for biofilm cells than for planktonic cells. This observation was more common for vancomycin and erythromycin. The MBCB ranged from 8 to >256 µg/mL for oxacillin, 128 to >128 µg/mL for vancomycin, 256 to >256 µg/mL for erythromycin and gentamicin, >64 µg/mL for linezolid, and 32/608 to >32/608 µg/mL for sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. The results showed considerably higher MICs for S. aureus and CoNS biofilm cells compared to planktonic cells. Analysis of MBCM confirmed that even high concentrations of vancomycin were unable to eliminate the biofilms of S. aureus and CoNS species. Linezolid was the most effective drug in inhibiting staphylococci in the biofilm, without an increase in the MIC, when compared to planktonic cells. None of the isolates were resistant to this drug.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of Cinnamic Acid and Its Derivatives: Synergistic Effects with Cloxacillin.

Zawila T, Swolana D, Rok J, Rzepka Z, Wojtyczka R Molecules. 2025; 30(3).

PMID: 39942764 PMC: 11820451. DOI: 10.3390/molecules30030660.


: an unusual cause of relapsing hematogenous septic arthritis of a native knee. Case report and review of the literature.

Wery A, Taghavi M, Nortier J, Mahadeb B, Raftakis I, Maillart E Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1494449.

PMID: 39610684 PMC: 11602291. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1494449.


Unraveling the Formation of Ternary AgCuSe Crystalline Nanophases and Their Potential as Antibacterial Agents.

Lin M, Vargas B, Yedra L, van Gog H, van Huis M, Mendes R Chem Mater. 2024; 36(20):10154-10166.

PMID: 39464291 PMC: 11500304. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c01604.


Effective biofilm eradication in MRSA isolates with aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme genes using high-concentration and prolonged gentamicin treatment.

Ando K, Miyahara S, Hanada S, Fukuda K, Saito M, Sakai A Microbiol Spectr. 2024; 12(10):e0064724.

PMID: 39191399 PMC: 11448082. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00647-24.


Clinical Profiles, Laboratory Biomarkers, and Mortality in Cancer Patients with Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Radwan S, Mourad D, Hamdy R, Kamel M, Abdel-Moneim A, Elkhashab D Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(6).

PMID: 38929518 PMC: 11205937. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60060901.


References
1.
Cafiso V, Bertuccio T, Santagati M, Campanile F, Amicosante G, Perilli M . Presence of the ica operon in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis and its role in biofilm production. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004; 10(12):1081-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.01024.x. View

2.
Frank K, Reichert E, Piper K, Patel R . In vitro effects of antimicrobial agents on planktonic and biofilm forms of Staphylococcus lugdunensis clinical isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006; 51(3):888-95. PMC: 1803120. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01052-06. View

3.
Oliveira A, Lourdes Rs Cunha M . Comparison of methods for the detection of biofilm production in coagulase-negative staphylococci. BMC Res Notes. 2010; 3:260. PMC: 2973941. DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-260. View

4.
Antunes A, Silva Trentin D, Bonfanti J, Pinto C, Perez L, Macedo A . Application of a feasible method for determination of biofilm antimicrobial susceptibility in staphylococci. APMIS. 2010; 118(11):873-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02681.x. View

5.
Otto M . Staphylococcal infections: mechanisms of biofilm maturation and detachment as critical determinants of pathogenicity. Annu Rev Med. 2012; 64:175-88. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-042711-140023. View