» Articles » PMID: 27595993

MRI Analysis of Tibial PCL Attachment in a Large Population of Adult Patients: Reference Data for Anatomic PCL Reconstruction

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2016 Sep 7
PMID 27595993
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Consistent reference data used for anatomic posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction is not well defined. Quantitative guidelines defining the location of PCL attachment would aid in performing anatomic PCL reconstruction. The purpose was to characterize anatomic parameters of the PCL tibial attachment based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a large population of adult knees.

Methods: The PCL tibial attachment site was examined in 736 adult knees with an intact PCL using 3.0-T proton density-weighted sagittal MRI. The outcomes measured were the anterior-posterior diameter (APD) of the tibial plateau; angle between the tibial plateau and the posterior tibial 'shelf' (the slope where the PCL tibial attachment site was) (PTS); length of the PTS; proximal, central, and distal PCL attachment positions as well as the width of the PCL attachment site; and vertical dimension of the PCL attachment site inferior from the tibial plateau.

Results: The average APD of the tibia plateau was 33.6 ± 3.5 mm, yielding significant differences between males (35.5 ± 3.0 mm) and females (31.6 ± 2.7 mm), P <.05, and there was a significantly decreasing trend with increasing age in males (P <.05). Mean angle between the tibial plateau and the PTS was 122.4° ± 8.1°, and subgroup analysis showed that the young group had a differently smaller angle (120.9° ± 7.5°) than the middle-aged (123.7° ± 8.2°) and the old (123.4° ± 7.7°) in males population, while there were no significant differences between sexes (P >.05). The proximal, central positions and width of the PCL attachment site were 13.4 ± 3.0 mm, 17.8 ± 3.0 mm and 9.6 ± 2.4 mm along the PTS, with significant differences between males and females (P <.05), and accounted for 60.0 % ± 9.1 %, 80.0 % ± 4.6 % and 43.3 % ± 9.7 % of the PTS respectively, with no significant differences between sexes and among age groups (all P >.05).

Conclusions: This study provides reference data of the tibial PCL attachment based on MRI in the sagittal orientation. In analysis of retrospective data from a large population of adult patients, the quantitative values can be used as references to define the inserted angle and depth of the drill guide, and the exact position and size of the tibial PCL tunnel for performing arthroscopic anatomic PCL reconstruction.

Citing Articles

The Permissive Safe Angle of the Tibial Tunnel in Transtibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Three-Dimensional Simulation Study.

Teng Y, Jia G, Da L, Peng B, Liu Z, Han H Orthop Surg. 2022; 14(6):1193-1202.

PMID: 35478490 PMC: 9163973. DOI: 10.1111/os.13266.


Successful reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament: assessment of posterior cruciate ligament footprints using an objective coordinate system.

Vielgut I, Weiglein A, Biber S, Dreu M, Leithner A, Hohenberger G Surg Radiol Anat. 2020; 42(10):1219-1223.

PMID: 32556668 PMC: 7366585. DOI: 10.1007/s00276-020-02520-9.


Bony landmark between the attachment of the medial meniscus posterior root and the posterior cruciate ligament: CT and MR imaging assessment.

Fujii M, Furumatsu T, Miyazawa S, Kodama Y, Hino T, Kamatsuki Y Skeletal Radiol. 2017; 46(8):1041-1045.

PMID: 28314900 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-017-2625-6.

References
1.
Montgomery S, Johnson J, McAllister D, Petrigliano F . Surgical management of PCL injuries: indications, techniques, and outcomes. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013; 6(2):115-23. PMC: 3702782. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-013-9162-2. View

2.
Osti M, Tschann P, Kunzel K, Benedetto K . Anatomic characteristics and radiographic references of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40(7):1558-63. DOI: 10.1177/0363546512445166. View

3.
Wind Jr W, Bergfeld J, Parker R . Evaluation and treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injuries: revisited. Am J Sports Med. 2004; 32(7):1765-75. DOI: 10.1177/0363546504270481. View

4.
Spiridonov S, Slinkard N, LaPrade R . Isolated and combined grade-III posterior cruciate ligament tears treated with double-bundle reconstruction with use of endoscopically placed femoral tunnels and grafts: operative technique and clinical outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93(19):1773-80. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01638. View

5.
Schulz M, Steenlage E, Russe K, Strobel M . Distribution of posterior tibial displacement in knees with posterior cruciate ligament tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(2):332-8. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.C.00834. View