» Articles » PMID: 27595602

Psychometric Evaluation and Wording Effects on the Chinese Version of the Parent-proxy Kid-KINDL

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2016 Sep 7
PMID 27595602
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The pediatric quality of life (QoL) questionnaire, the child-rated Kid-KINDL, has wording effects. However, no studies have examined for its parallel questionnaire, the parent-proxy Kid-KINDL. This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties and wording effects of the parent-proxy Kid-KINDL.

Methods: Parents with 8- to 12-year-old children (n = 247) completed the parent-proxy Kid-KINDL, 83 of them completed it again 7-14 days later, and 241 of their children completed the child-rated Kid-KINDL. Internal consistency was examined using Cronbach's α; test-retest reliability and concurrent validity, using Pearson correlation coefficients (r); construct validity and wording effects, using confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs).

Results: The internal consistency of the parent-proxy Kid-KINDL total score was acceptable (α = .86). Test-retest reliability (r = .33-.60) and concurrent validity (r = .27-.42) were acceptable or nearly acceptable for all subscales and the total score. The CFA models simultaneously accounting for QoL traits and wording effects had satisfactory fit indices, and outperformed the model accounting only for QoL traits. However, four subscales had unsatisfactory internal consistency, which might be attributable to wording effects.

Conclusion: When children are unable to complete a QoL questionnaire, the parent-proxy Kid-KINDL can substitute with all due cautions to wording effects and inconsistent reliability among different raters.

Citing Articles

Problematic Use of Internet Associates with Poor Quality of Life via Psychological Distress in Invididuals with ADHD.

Chen C, Lee K, Fung X, Chen J, Lai Y, Potenza M Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024; 17:443-455.

PMID: 38352630 PMC: 10863463. DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S449369.


Evaluation of Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Domains in the Assessment of the Quality of Life in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Wu C, Wang Y, Chen W, Fang F, Li S, Huang T Cancer Manag Res. 2023; 15:719-728.

PMID: 37485039 PMC: 10362877. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S416353.


Effects of fundamental movement skills on health-related quality of life in Chinese school-age children: the mediating role of physical fitness level.

Xie S, Zhou Y, Yin Y, Shao R, Fang L, Shao W Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1023662.

PMID: 37206866 PMC: 10188959. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1023662.


The Motors of COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptance Scale (MoVac-COVID19S): Measurement Invariant Evidence for Its Nine-Item Version in Taiwan, Indonesia, and Malaysia.

Pramukti I, Strong C, Chen I, Yen C, Rifai A, Ibrahim K Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022; 15:1617-1625.

PMID: 35791407 PMC: 9250771. DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S363757.


Adapting the Motors of Influenza Vaccination Acceptance Scale into the Motors of COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptance Scale: Psychometric evaluation among mainland Chinese university students.

Chen I, Ahorsu D, Ko N, Yen C, Lin C, Griffiths M Vaccine. 2021; 39(32):4510-4515.

PMID: 34217571 PMC: 8216877. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.06.044.


References
1.
Podsakoff P, Mackenzie S, Lee J, Podsakoff N . Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003; 88(5):879-903. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879. View

2.
Marsh H . Positive and negative global self-esteem: a substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors?. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996; 70(4):810-9. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.70.4.810. View

3.
Lin C, Kumar S, Pakpour A . Rasch analysis of the Persian version of PedsQL(TM) Oral Health Scale: further psychometric evaluation on item validity including differential item functioning. Health Promot Perspect. 2016; 6(3):145-51. PMC: 5002881. DOI: 10.15171/hpp.2016.23. View

4.
Ohaeri J, Awadalla A . The reliability and validity of the short version of the WHO Quality of Life Instrument in an Arab general population. Ann Saudi Med. 2009; 29(2):98-104. PMC: 2813624. DOI: 10.4103/0256-4947.51790. View

5.
Helseth S, Lund T . Assessing health-related quality of life in adolescents: some psychometric properties of the first Norwegian version of KINDL. Scand J Caring Sci. 2005; 19(2):102-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2005.00326.x. View