» Articles » PMID: 27595079

Use of a New Knee Prosthesis As an Articulating Spacer in Two-Stage Revision of Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2016 Sep 6
PMID 27595079
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To report our experience with two-stage revision using a new femoral component (NFC) spacer (Depuy Synthes) as an articulating spacer.

Materials And Methods: In this retrospective study, we reviewed 22 two-stage revisions that were performed using an NFC spacer in 22 patients suspected of having an infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from December 2010 to March 2013. The result was considered successful when eradication of infection was achieved using only one NFC spacer.

Results: The average time from primary TKA to the first stage procedure was 29.1 months and the average time from the first stage procedure until the final second stage procedure was 12.7 weeks. The average range of motion increased from 82° preoperatively to 104° postoperatively. The American Knee Society Knee score increased from 29.3 points to 66 points. The Function score increased from 29.5 points to 64 points. Four cases were reinfected after two-stage revision. The mean follow-up was 37.6 months.

Conclusions: The new articulating spacer showed promising short-term results both with regard to eradication of infection and functional improvement.

Citing Articles

Handmade articulating spacer for two-stage exchange at the knee.

Ludemann M, von Hertzberg-Bolch S, Gurok A, Oberfeld J, Rudert M Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2023; 35(3-4):154-162.

PMID: 37173423 DOI: 10.1007/s00064-023-00810-0.


Articular spacers in two-stage revision arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection of the hip and the knee.

Craig A, King S, van Duren B, Veysi V, Jain S, Palan J EFORT Open Rev. 2022; 7(2):137-152.

PMID: 35192512 PMC: 8897569. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-21-0037.


Temporary new implant spacers increase post-reimplantation total knee prosthesis survival after periprosthetic joint infection.

Woon C, Nguyen J, Kapadia M, Russell C, Henry M, Miller A Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020; 29(11):3621-3632.

PMID: 33083860 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06325-6.


Treatment of Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Ha C Knee Surg Relat Res. 2017; 29(3):153-154.

PMID: 28854759 PMC: 5596398. DOI: 10.5792/ksrr.17.301.

References
1.
Blom A, Brown J, Taylor A, Pattison G, Whitehouse S, Bannister G . Infection after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86(5):688-91. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b5.14887. View

2.
Silvestre A, Almeida F, Renovell P, Morante E, Lopez R . Revision of infected total knee arthroplasty: two-stage reimplantation using an antibiotic-impregnated static spacer. Clin Orthop Surg. 2013; 5(3):180-7. PMC: 3758987. DOI: 10.4055/cios.2013.5.3.180. View

3.
Kalore N, Maheshwari A, Sharma A, Cheng E, Gioe T . Is there a preferred articulating spacer technique for infected knee arthroplasty? A preliminary study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 470(1):228-35. PMC: 3237967. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2037-1. View

4.
Park S, Song E, Seon J, Yoon T, Park G . Comparison of static and mobile antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers for the treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2009; 34(8):1181-6. PMC: 2989090. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0907-x. View

5.
Freeman M, Fehring T, Odum S, Fehring K, Griffin W, Mason J . Functional advantage of articulating versus static spacers in 2-stage revision for total knee arthroplasty infection. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(8):1116-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.009. View