» Articles » PMID: 27594810

Social Influences on Abstinence Self-Efficacy Among Justice-Involved Persons

Overview
Publisher Routledge
Specialty Health Services
Date 2016 Sep 6
PMID 27594810
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Social influences (social support for alcohol/drug use and social support for abstinence) were examined in relation to abstinence self-efficacy among a sample of 250 justice involved persons exiting inpatient treatment for substance use disorders. Hierarchical linear regression was used to examine social influences in relation to abstinence self-efficacy. Social influences were significantly related to abstinence self-efficacy when examined independently. However, only social support for alcohol/drug use was significant when both social influences were entered into the model. Findings suggest social support for alcohol/drug use compromises abstinence social support, particularly among justice involved persons who are early in their recovery from substance use disorders.

References
1.
Miller W, Del Boca F . Measurement of drinking behavior using the Form 90 family of instruments. J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 1994; 12:112-8. DOI: 10.15288/jsas.1994.s12.112. View

2.
Jason L, Davis M, Ferrari J . The need for substance abuse after-care: longitudinal analysis of Oxford House. Addict Behav. 2006; 32(4):803-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.06.014. View

3.
Rotunda R, West L, OFarrell T . Enabling behavior in a clinical sample of alcohol-dependent clients and their partners. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2004; 26(4):269-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2004.01.007. View

4.
Riehman K, Wechsberg W, Zule W, Lam W, Levine B . Gender differences in the impact of social support on crack use among African Americans. Subst Use Misuse. 2008; 43(1):85-104. DOI: 10.1080/10826080701205661. View

5.
Buckman J, Bates M, Morgenstern J . Social support and cognitive impairment in clients receiving treatment for alcohol- and drug-use disorders: a replication study. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008; 69(5):738-46. PMC: 2575395. DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2008.69.738. View