» Articles » PMID: 27587971

Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization of Vertebrobasilar Dissecting Aneurysms: Procedural Outcomes and Factors for Recanalization

Overview
Journal Korean J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2016 Sep 3
PMID 27587971
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Outcomes of stent-assisted coil embolization (SACE) have not been well established in the setting of vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms (VBDAs) due to the low percentage of cases that need treatment and the array of available therapeutic options. Herein, we presented clinical and radiographic results of SACE in patients with VBDAs.

Materials And Methods: A total of 47 patients (M:F, 30:17; mean age ± SD, 53.7 ± 12.6 years), with a VBDA who underwent SACE between 2008 and 2014 at two institutions were evaluated retrospectively. Medical records and radiologic data were analyzed to assess the outcome of SACE procedures. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was conducted to determine the factors that were associated with aneurysmal recanalization after SACE.

Results: Stent-assisted coil embolization technically succeeded in all patients. Three cerebellar infarctions occurred on postembolization day 1, week 2, and month 2, but no other procedure-related complications developed. Immediately following SACE, 25 aneurysms (53.2%) showed no contrast filling into the aneurysmal sac. During a mean follow-up of 20.2 months, 37 lesions (78.7%) appeared completely occluded, whereas 10 lesions showed recanalization, 5 of which required additional embolization. Overall recanalization rate was 12.64% per lesion-year, and mean postoperative time to recanalization was 18 months (range, 3-36 months). In multivariable analysis, major branch involvement (hazard ratio [HR]: 7.28; p = 0.013) and the presence of residual sac filling (HR: 8.49, p = 0.044) were identified as statistically significant independent predictors of recanalization. No bleeding was encountered in follow-up monitoring.

Conclusion: Stent-assisted coil embolization appears feasible and safe for treatment of VBDAs. Long-term results were acceptable in a majority of patients studied, despite a relatively high rate of incomplete occlusion immediately after SACE. Major branch involvement and coiled aneurysms with residual sac filling may predispose to recanalization.

Citing Articles

Comparison of outcomes between anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies for intracranial arterial dissections.

Lee S, Kim M, Park S, Park J, Park B, Jung W Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1469697.

PMID: 39697441 PMC: 11652506. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1469697.


Flow diverter versus stent-assisted coiling treatment for managing dissecting intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Brenner L, Prestes M, Soares C, Romeiro P, Gomez V, Rabelo N Interv Neuroradiol. 2024; :15910199241301820.

PMID: 39668743 PMC: 11638934. DOI: 10.1177/15910199241301820.


Low-profile visualized intraluminal support-within-Enterprise overlapping-stent technique versus flow diversion in the treatment of intracranial vertebrobasilar trunk dissecting aneurysms.

Wu Q, Wang C, Xu S, Ji Z, Qi J, Li Y Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023; 13(6):3536-3546.

PMID: 37284083 PMC: 10239987. DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-970.


LVIS-within-enterprise double-stent technique with coil embolization in the treatment of patients with acutely ruptured intracranial vertebrobasilar artery-dissecting aneurysms.

Wu Q, Meng Y, Chen A, Xu S, Wang C, Ji Z Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1069380.

PMID: 37034072 PMC: 10081676. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1069380.


Outcomes of reconstructive endovascular treatment of vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms with intramural hematoma.

Zhang Y, Peng Q, Zhou Y, Wang C, Zhang L, Yang X Front Neurol. 2022; 13:914878.

PMID: 36034310 PMC: 9403782. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.914878.


References
1.
Kim B, Kim S, Kim D, Shin Y, Suh S, Kim D . Outcomes and prognostic factors of intracranial unruptured vertebrobasilar artery dissection. Neurology. 2011; 76(20):1735-41. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821a7d94. View

2.
Cho Y, Lee W, Kim K, Kang H, Kim J, Han M . Stent-assisted coil embolization of posterior communicating artery aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013; 34(11):2171-6. PMC: 7964851. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3541. View

3.
Cho Y, Lee J, Seo J, Lee S, Kang H, Kim J . Does stent implantation improve the result of repeat embolization in recanalized aneurysms?. Neurosurgery. 2012; 71(2 Suppl Operative):ons253-9. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182647a97. View

4.
Cho Y, Rhim J, Kang H, Park J, Jeon J, Kim J . Use of Triple Microcatheters for Endovascular Treatment of Wide-Necked Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single Center Experience. Korean J Radiol. 2015; 16(5):1109-18. PMC: 4559783. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.5.1109. View

5.
Murayama Y, Nien Y, Duckwiler G, Gobin Y, Jahan R, Frazee J . Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years' experience. J Neurosurg. 2003; 98(5):959-66. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2003.98.5.0959. View