» Articles » PMID: 27587911

How Does Auditory Training Work? Joined-Up Thinking and Listening

Overview
Journal Semin Hear
Date 2016 Sep 3
PMID 27587911
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Auditory training aims to compensate for degradation in the auditory signal and is offered as an intervention to help alleviate the most common complaint in people with hearing loss, understanding speech in a background noise. Yet there remain many unanswered questions. This article reviews some of the key pieces of evidence that assess the evidence for whether, and how, auditory training benefits adults with hearing loss. The evidence supports that improvements occur on the trained task; however, transfer of that learning to generalized real-world benefit is much less robust. For more than a decade, there has been an increasing awareness of the role that cognition plays in listening. But more recently in the auditory training literature, there has been an increased focus on assessing how cognitive performance relevant for listening may improve with training. We argue that this is specifically the case for measures that index executive processes, such as monitoring, attention switching, and updating of working memory, all of which are required for successful listening and communication in challenging or adverse listening conditions. We propose combined auditory-cognitive training approaches, where training interventions develop cognition embedded within auditory tasks, which are most likely to offer generalized benefits to the real-world listening abilities of people with hearing loss.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of acoustic stimulation techniques on cognitive functions in individuals with Alzheimer's disease-a scoping review.

Thamizhmani L, Ganapathy K, Palaniswamy H, Patil D, Purdy S Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024; 16(1):174.

PMID: 39085956 PMC: 11293131. DOI: 10.1186/s13195-024-01544-2.


Feasibility of a Smartphone-Based Hearing Aid App for Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss: Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jo S, Park M, Seo J, Lee K, Han J, Lim J JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023; 11:e46911.

PMID: 37800887 PMC: 10578122. DOI: 10.2196/46911.


Remote Technologies to Enhance Service Delivery for Adults: Clinical Research Perspectives.

Ferguson M, Eikelboom R, Sucher C, Maidment D, Bennett R Semin Hear. 2023; 44(3):328-350.

PMID: 37484990 PMC: 10361795. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1769742.


Guidelines for Best Practice in the Audiological Management of Adults Using Bimodal Hearing Configurations.

Holder J, Holcomb M, Snapp H, Labadie R, Vroegop J, Rocca C Otol Neurotol Open. 2022; 2(2).

PMID: 36274668 PMC: 9581116. DOI: 10.1097/ONO.0000000000000011.


Editorial: Outcome Measures to Assess the Benefit of Interventions for Adults With Hearing Loss: From Research to Clinical Application.

Boisvert I, Ferguson M, van Wieringen A, Ricketts T Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:955189.

PMID: 36061602 PMC: 9434333. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.955189.


References
1.
Hickson L, Worrall L, Scarinci N . A randomized controlled trial evaluating the active communication education program for older people with hearing impairment. Ear Hear. 2007; 28(2):212-30. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31803126c8. View

2.
de Boer J, Thornton A . Neural correlates of perceptual learning in the auditory brainstem: efferent activity predicts and reflects improvement at a speech-in-noise discrimination task. J Neurosci. 2008; 28(19):4929-37. PMC: 6670751. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0902-08.2008. View

3.
Boothroyd A . Adapting to changed hearing: the potential role of formal training. J Am Acad Audiol. 2011; 21(9):601-11. DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.21.9.6. View

4.
Sundewall Thoren E, Oberg M, Wanstrom G, Andersson G, Lunner T . A randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of online rehabilitative intervention for adult hearing-aid users. Int J Audiol. 2014; 53(7):452-61. DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2014.892643. View

5.
Bavelier D, Davidson R . Brain training: Games to do you good. Nature. 2013; 494(7438):425-6. DOI: 10.1038/494425a. View