» Articles » PMID: 27586887

Objectively Measured Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity in a Sample of Finnish Adults: a Cross-sectional Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2016 Sep 3
PMID 27586887
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Regular physical activity (PA) confers many positive effects on health and well-being. Sedentary behavior (SB), in turn, is a risk factor for health, regardless of the level of moderate to vigorous PA. The present study describes the levels of objectively measured SB, breaks in SB, standing still and PA among Finnish adults.

Methods: This cross-sectional analysis is based on the sub-sample of the population-based Health 2011 Study of Finnish adults. The study population consisted of 18-to-85-year old men and women who wore a waist-worn triaxial accelerometer (Hookie AM 20) for at least 4 days, for at least 10 h per day (n = 1587) during a week. PA and SB were objectively assessed from the raw accelerometric data using novel processing and analysis algorithms with mean amplitude deviation as the processing method. The data was statistically analyzed using cross-tabulations, analysis of variance and analysis of covariance.

Results: The participants were on average 52 years old, 57 % being women. Participants were sedentary 59 % of their waking wear time, mainly sitting. They spent 17 % of the time standing still, 15 % in light intensity PA, 9 % in moderate PA and less than 1 % in vigorous PA. Participants aged 30-39 years had the highest number of breaks in SB per day. Younger participants (<30 years of age) had more moderate and vigorous PA than older ones (≥60 years of age), and 30-60-year-olds had the greatest amount of light PA.

Conclusions: Participants spent nearly 60 % of their waking time sedentary, and the majority of their daily PA was light. From a public health perspective it is important to find effective ways to decrease SB as well as to increase the level of PA. Our analysis method of raw accelerometer data may allow more precise assessment of dose-response relationships between objectively measured PA and SB and various indicators of health and well-being.

Citing Articles

The relationship between physical activity and psychological sub-health among high altitude region Tibetan college students.

Wang S, Niu Z, Xiong J, Chai G, Ye X Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1465845.

PMID: 39664639 PMC: 11632234. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1465845.


Sedentary behavior reduction and blood lipids in adults with metabolic syndrome: a 6-month randomized controlled trial.

Ylinen V, Sjoros T, Laine S, Garthwaite T, Norha J, Vaha-Ypya H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):24241.

PMID: 39414998 PMC: 11484901. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75579-8.


Sociodemographic Factors Related to Perceived Physical Activity on Chilean Adults after COVID-19 Pandemic.

Gallardo-Rodriguez R, Poblete-Valderrama F, Rodas-Kurten V, Vilas-Boas J Sports (Basel). 2024; 12(9).

PMID: 39330715 PMC: 11435602. DOI: 10.3390/sports12090238.


Evaluating the Let's Move It intervention programme theory for adolescents' physical activity: Theorized psychosocial mechanisms of behavioural changes.

Palsola M, Araujo-Soares V, Hardeman W, Haukkala A, Heino M, Sniehotta F Br J Health Psychol. 2024; 30(1):e12744.

PMID: 39317658 PMC: 11586702. DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12744.


Comparing national device-based physical activity surveillance systems: a systematic review.

de Wolf I, Elevelt A, van Nassau F, Toepoel V, de Hollander E, Kompier M Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024; 21(1):67.

PMID: 38961445 PMC: 11223351. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-024-01612-8.


References
1.
Chastin S, Schwarz U, Skelton D, Skelton D . Development of a consensus taxonomy of sedentary behaviors (SIT): report of Delphi Round 1. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12):e82313. PMC: 3847079. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082313. View

2.
Matthews C, Chen K, Freedson P, Buchowski M, Beech B, Pate R . Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004. Am J Epidemiol. 2008; 167(7):875-81. PMC: 3527832. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwm390. View

3.
Helmerhorst H, Brage S, Warren J, Besson H, Ekelund U . A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012; 9:103. PMC: 3492158. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-103. View

4.
Lee I, Shiroma E, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair S, Katzmarzyk P . Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012; 380(9838):219-29. PMC: 3645500. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9. View

5.
Celis-Morales C, Perez-Bravo F, Ibanez L, Salas C, Bailey M, Gill J . Objective vs. self-reported physical activity and sedentary time: effects of measurement method on relationships with risk biomarkers. PLoS One. 2012; 7(5):e36345. PMC: 3348936. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036345. View