» Articles » PMID: 27581337

Ge-CRISPR - An Integrated Pipeline for the Prediction and Analysis of SgRNAs Genome Editing Efficiency for CRISPR/Cas System

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2016 Sep 2
PMID 27581337
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genome editing by sgRNA a component of CRISPR/Cas system emerged as a preferred technology for genome editing in recent years. However, activity and stability of sgRNA in genome targeting is greatly influenced by its sequence features. In this endeavor, a few prediction tools have been developed to design effective sgRNAs but these methods have their own limitations. Therefore, we have developed "ge-CRISPR" using high throughput data for the prediction and analysis of sgRNAs genome editing efficiency. Predictive models were employed using SVM for developing pipeline-1 (classification) and pipeline-2 (regression) using 2090 and 4139 experimentally verified sgRNAs respectively from Homo sapiens, Mus musculus, Danio rerio and Xenopus tropicalis. During 10-fold cross validation we have achieved accuracy and Matthew's correlation coefficient of 87.70% and 0.75 for pipeline-1 on training dataset (T(1840)) while it performed equally well on independent dataset (V(250)). In pipeline-2 we attained Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.68 and 0.69 using best models on training (T(3169)) and independent dataset (V(520)) correspondingly. ge-CRISPR (http://bioinfo.imtech.res.in/manojk/gecrispr/) for a given genomic region will identify potent sgRNAs, their qualitative as well as quantitative efficiencies along with potential off-targets. It will be useful to scientific community engaged in CRISPR research and therapeutics development.

Citing Articles

The Evolution of Nucleic Acid-Based Diagnosis Methods from the (pre-)CRISPR to CRISPR era and the Associated Machine/Deep Learning Approaches in Relevant RNA Design.

Chakraborty S, Ray Dutta J, Ganesan R, Minary P Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2847:241-300.

PMID: 39312149 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4079-1_17.


Codon usage and expression-based features significantly improve prediction of CRISPR efficiency.

Bergman S, Tuller T NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2024; 10(1):100.

PMID: 39227603 PMC: 11372048. DOI: 10.1038/s41540-024-00431-8.


Strong association between genomic 3D structure and CRISPR cleavage efficiency.

Bergman S, Tuller T PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(6):e1012214.

PMID: 38848440 PMC: 11189236. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012214.


gRNA Design: How Its Evolution Impacted on CRISPR/Cas9 Systems Refinement.

Motoche-Monar C, Ordonez J, Chang O, Gonzales-Zubiate F Biomolecules. 2023; 13(12).

PMID: 38136570 PMC: 10741458. DOI: 10.3390/biom13121698.


CRISPR genome editing using computational approaches: A survey.

Alipanahi R, Safari L, Khanteymoori A Front Bioinform. 2023; 2:1001131.

PMID: 36710911 PMC: 9875887. DOI: 10.3389/fbinf.2022.1001131.


References
1.
Xie F, Ye L, Chang J, Beyer A, Wang J, Muench M . Seamless gene correction of β-thalassemia mutations in patient-specific iPSCs using CRISPR/Cas9 and piggyBac. Genome Res. 2014; 24(9):1526-33. PMC: 4158758. DOI: 10.1101/gr.173427.114. View

2.
Shan Q, Wang Y, Li J, Zhang Y, Chen K, Liang Z . Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol. 2013; 31(8):686-8. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2650. View

3.
Qureshi A, Tandon H, Kumar M . AVP-IC50 Pred: Multiple machine learning techniques-based prediction of peptide antiviral activity in terms of half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50). Biopolymers. 2015; 104(6):753-63. PMC: 7161829. DOI: 10.1002/bip.22703. View

4.
Tebas P, Stein D, Tang W, Frank I, Wang S, Lee G . Gene editing of CCR5 in autologous CD4 T cells of persons infected with HIV. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370(10):901-10. PMC: 4084652. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1300662. View

5.
Kirchner M, Schneider S . CRISPR-Cas: From the Bacterial Adaptive Immune System to a Versatile Tool for Genome Engineering. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2015; 54(46):13508-14. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201504741. View