Alpha 2.0
Login Register
» Articles » PMID: 27579954

The Impact of a Researcher's Structural Position on Scientific Performance: An Empirical Analysis

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Specialties General Medicine
Science
Date 2016 Sep 1
PMID 27579954
Citations 7
Authors
Damien Contandriopoulos
Arnaud Duhoux
Catherine Larouche
Melanie Perroux
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This article discusses the nature and structure of scientific collaboration as well as the association between academic collaboration networks and scientific productivity. Based on empirical data gathered from the CVs of 73 researchers affiliated with an academic research network in Canada, this study used social network analysis (SNA) to examine the association between researchers' structural position in the network and their scientific performance. With reference to Granovetter's and Burt's theories on weak ties and structural holes, we argue it is the bridging position a researcher holds in a scientific network that matters most to improve scientific performance. The results of correlation scores between network centrality and two different indicators of scientific performance indicate there is a robust association between researchers' structural position in collaboration networks and their scientific performance. We believe this finding, and the method we have developed, could have implications for the way research networks are managed and researchers are supported.

Citing Articles

Effects of Social Networks on Job Performance of Individuals among the Hypertension Management Teams in Rural China.

Xia Q, Xu Y, Liu X, Liu Y, Wu J, Zhang M Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(15).

PMID: 37570458 PMC: 10419314. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11152218.

Dynamic academic networking concept and its links with English language skills and research productivity-non-Anglophone context.

Wieczorek A, Mitrega M, Spacil V PLoS One. 2021; 16(2):e0245980.

PMID: 33529212 PMC: 7853504. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245980.

Do women in science form more diverse research networks than men? An analysis of Spanish biomedical scientists.

Diaz-Faes A, Otero-Hermida P, Ozman M, DEste P PLoS One. 2020; 15(8):e0238229.

PMID: 32853227 PMC: 7451541. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238229.

Measuring researchers' potential scholarly impact with structural variations: Four types of researchers in information science (1979-2018).

Hou J, Yang X, Chen C PLoS One. 2020; 15(6):e0234347.

PMID: 32569295 PMC: 7307741. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234347.

Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers.

Li W, Aste T, Caccioli F, Livan G Nat Commun. 2019; 10(1):5170.

PMID: 31729362 PMC: 6858367. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13130-4.

References
1.
Cline M, Smoot M, Cerami E, Kuchinsky A, Landys N, Workman C . Integration of biological networks and gene expression data using Cytoscape. Nat Protoc. 2007; 2(10):2366-82. PMC: 3685583. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2007.324. View
2.
De Groote S, Raszewski R . Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: a case study of the h-index in nursing. Nurs Outlook. 2012; 60(6):391-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2012.04.007. View
3.
Merton R . The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science. 1968; 159(3810):56-63. View
4.
Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga N, Wang J, Ramage D . Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003; 13(11):2498-504. PMC: 403769. DOI: 10.1101/gr.1239303. View
5.
Hirsch J . An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(46):16569-72. PMC: 1283832. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102. View