» Articles » PMID: 27579241

Heads-up 3D Microscopy: An Ergonomic and Educational Approach to Microsurgery

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2016 Sep 1
PMID 27579241
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Traditional microsurgery can lead surgeons to use postures that cause musculoskeletal fatigue, leaving them more prone to work-related injuries. A new technology from TrueVision transmits the microscopic image onto a 3-dimensional (3D) monitor, allowing surgeons to operate while sitting/standing in a heads-up position. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of performing heads-up 3D microscopy as a more ergonomic alternative to traditional microsurgery. A feasibility study was conducted comparing heads-up 3D microscopy and traditional microscopy by performing femoral artery anastomoses on 8 Sprague-Dawley rats. Operative times and patency rates for each technology were compared. The 8 microsurgeons completed a questionnaire comparing image quality, comfort, technical feasibility, and educational value of the 2 technologies. Rat femoral artery anastomoses were successfully carried out by all 8 microsurgeons with each technology. There was no significant difference in anastomosis time between heads-up 3D and traditional microscopy (average times, 34.5 and 33.8 minutes, respectively; P = 0.66). Heads-up 3D microscopy was rated superior in neck and back comfort by 75% of participants. Image resolution, field of view, and technical feasibility were found to be superior or equivalent in 75% of participants, whereas 63% evaluated depth perception to be superior or equivalent. Heads-up 3D microscopy is a new technology that improves comfort for the microsurgeon without compromising image quality or technical feasibility. Its use has become prevalent in the field of ophthalmology and may also have utility in plastic and reconstructive surgery.

Citing Articles

Comparing the Randomized Trial Outcomes of 3D Low-Light Intensity-Assisted and Traditional Eyepiece-Assisted Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.

Ge X, Liu D, Liu Y, Fan F, Wang Y, Zhang Z Ophthalmic Res. 2024; 68(1):90-99.

PMID: 39715605 PMC: 11844667. DOI: 10.1159/000543135.


Randomized trial comparing the effects of a 3D head-up system and microscope eyepiece-assisted simulated vitrectomy with intraocular illumination on the ocular surface of an operator.

Ge X, Liu D, Fan F, Xu T, Zhang Z, Liu H BMC Ophthalmol. 2024; 24(1):241.

PMID: 38853245 PMC: 11163792. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-024-03516-4.


Ergonomic benefit using heads-up display compared to conventional surgical microscope in Japanese ophthalmologists.

Kamei M, Suzuki H, Terayama H, Ghafouri R, Ainslie-Garcia M, Ferko N PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0297461.

PMID: 38776346 PMC: 11111003. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297461.


Comparison of three-dimensional heads-up system versus traditional microscopic system in medical education for vitreoretinal surgeries: a prospective study.

Zhao X, Zhao Q, Li N, Wang C, Wang Y, Meng L BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):290.

PMID: 38491487 PMC: 10943918. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05233-4.


The User Experience on a 3-Dimensional Heads-Up Display for Vitreoretinal Surgery Across All Members of the Health Care Team: A Survey of Medical Students, Residents, Fellows, Attending Surgeons, Nurses, and Anesthesiologists.

Shoshany T, Agranat J, Armstrong G, Miller J J Vitreoretin Dis. 2023; 4(6):459-466.

PMID: 37007658 PMC: 9976070. DOI: 10.1177/2474126420929614.


References
1.
Kantor E, Berci G, Partlow E, Paz-Partlow M . A completely new approach to microlaryngeal surgery. Laryngoscope. 1991; 101(6 Pt 1):676-9. DOI: 10.1288/00005537-199106000-00018. View

2.
Bhadri P, Rowley A, Khurana R, Deboer C, Kerns R, Chong L . Evaluation of a stereoscopic camera-based three-dimensional viewing workstation for ophthalmic surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007; 143(5):891-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.12.032. View

3.
Liu J, Chen B, Ni Y, Zhan Y, Gao H . Application of a three-dimensional microsurgical video system for a rat femoral vessel anastomosis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2014; 127(2):348-52. View

4.
Tosun Z, Karabekmez F, Duymaz A, Ozkan A, Keskin M, Avunduk M . Preventing negative effects of smoking on microarterial anastomosis. Ann Plast Surg. 2010; 65(1):91-5. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181b404fa. View

5.
Capone A, Parikh P, Gatti M, Davidson B, Davison S . Occupational injury in plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 125(5):1555-1561. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d62a94. View