» Articles » PMID: 27574821

Diagnostic Pathway with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Standard Pathway: Results from a Randomized Prospective Study in Biopsy-naïve Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer

Overview
Journal Eur Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2016 Aug 31
PMID 27574821
Citations 79
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: An approach based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) might increase the detection rate (DR) of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).

Objective: To compare an mpMRI-based pathway with the standard approach for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) and csPCa.

Design, Setting, And Participants: Between November 2014 and April 2016, 212 biopsy-naïve patients with suspected PCa (prostate specific antigen level ≤15 ng/ml and negative digital rectal examination results) were included in this randomized clinical trial. Patients were randomized into a prebiopsy mpMRI group (arm A, n=107) or a standard biopsy (SB) group (arm B, n=105).

Intervention: In arm A, patients with mpMRI evidence of lesions suspected for PCa underwent mpMRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion software-guided targeted biopsy (TB) (n=81). The remaining patients in arm A (n=26) with negative mpMRI results and patients in arm B underwent 12-core SB.

Outcomes Measurements And Statistical Analysis: The primary end point was comparison of the DR of PCa and csPCa between the two arms of the study; the secondary end point was comparison of the DR between TB and SB.

Results And Limitations: The overall DRs were higher in arm A versus arm B for PCa (50.5% vs 29.5%, respectively; p=0.002) and csPCa (43.9% vs 18.1%, respectively; p<0.001). Concerning the biopsy approach, that is, TB in arm A, SB in arm A, and SB in arm B, the overall DRs were significantly different for PCa (60.5% vs 19.2% vs 29.5%, respectively; p<0.001) and for csPCa (56.8% vs 3.8% vs 18.1%, respectively; p<0.001). The reproducibility of the study could have been affected by the single-center nature.

Conclusions: A diagnostic pathway based on mpMRI had a higher DR than the standard pathway in both PCa and csPCa.

Patient Summary: In this randomized trial, a pathway for the diagnosis of prostate cancer based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) was compared with the standard pathway based on random biopsy. The mpMRI-based pathway had better performance than the standard pathway.

Citing Articles

Association Between Prostate Cancer Detection Rate and Year of Prostate Biopsy.

Uhm Y, Bang W, Chung J, Oh C, Kim H, Cho J Life (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40003668 PMC: 11856573. DOI: 10.3390/life15020260.


Identifying Optimal Prostate Biopsy Strategy for the Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) in Biopsy-Naïve Population.

Aloufi W, Al Mopti A, Al-Tawil A, Huang Z, Nabi G Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39941825 PMC: 11816062. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030458.


Does the type of the previous biopsy affect the fusion prostate biopsy results?.

Sonmez G, Golbasi A, Bas U, Akinsal E, Baydilli N, Tombul S Prostate Int. 2025; 12(3):155-159.

PMID: 39816939 PMC: 11733759. DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.07.001.


Role of Systematic Biopsy in the Era of Targeted Biopsy: A Review.

Malewski W, Milecki T, Tayara O, Poletajew S, Kryst P, Tokarczyk A Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(9):5171-5194.

PMID: 39330011 PMC: 11430858. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31090383.


Analysis of the Performance and Accuracy of a PSA and PSA Ratio-Based Nomogram to Predict the Probability of Prostate Cancer in a Cohort of Patients with PIRADS 3 Findings at Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Palmisano F, Lorusso V, Legnani R, Martorello V, Nedbal C, Tramanzoli P Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(17).

PMID: 39272942 PMC: 11394649. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16173084.