» Articles » PMID: 27568311

Trends in Metformin Utilisation and Dose Appropriateness in Australia

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2016 Aug 29
PMID 27568311
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The study aimed to (1) determine the trends in the utilisation of metformin in Australia, (2) determine the appropriateness of metformin dosing in an Australian teaching hospital and (3) gather the opinions of prescribers on the relationship between metformin dose and renal function.

Methods: National prescription data between 1990 and 2012 were accessed. A retrospective audit (2008-2012) of metformin doses and patient renal function (20 % random sample of all in-patients prescribed metformin) was conducted at St Vincent's Hospital (SVH), Sydney. Prescribers of metformin were interviewed (semi-structured; consultants at SVH) or surveyed (Australian endocrinologists) to gather their understanding of metformin dosing in relation to renal function.

Results: Metformin utilisation increased fivefold nationally between 1995 and 2012. Metformin tended to be under-dosed in SVH patients with normal renal function (83.5 %) and over-dosed in patients with impaired renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min, 50 %). Consultants indicated that metformin doses needed to be reduced in renal impairment. Most endocrinologists (61 %) were comfortable prescribing metformin down to eGFRs around 30 mL/min.

Conclusion: The use of metformin increased greatly over the period of the study. Metformin is prescribed frequently for patients with eGFR values below the minimal level approved in the product label (60 mL/min). While prescribers expressed their understanding of the need to reduce metformin doses in patients with renal impairment, we found that metformin doses were higher than appropriate in patients with impaired renal function. Metformin may be used safely when renal function is poor provided dosage is appropriately reduced.

Citing Articles

Trends of Antihypertensive, Antidiabetic, and Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Use among the Health Workers Cohort Study, Mexico 2004 to 2018.

Ortega-Montiel J, Montoya A, Soria-Saucedo R, Gallegos-Carrillo K, Ramirez-Palacios P, Salmeron J Adv Pharmacol Pharm Sci. 2023; 2023:5555274.

PMID: 38035129 PMC: 10684324. DOI: 10.1155/2023/5555274.

References
1.
Duong J, Furlong T, Roberts D, Graham G, Greenfield J, Williams K . The Role of Metformin in Metformin-Associated Lactic Acidosis (MALA): Case Series and Formulation of a Model of Pathogenesis. Drug Saf. 2013; 36(9):733-46. DOI: 10.1007/s40264-013-0038-6. View

2.
Huang W, Peterson G, Zaidi S, Castelino R . Metformin utilisation in Australian community and aged care settings. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015; 108(2):336-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2015.01.041. View

3.
Vasisht K, Chen S, Peng Y, Bakris G . Limitations of metformin use in patients with kidney disease: are they warranted?. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2010; 12(12):1079-83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2010.01295.x. View

4.
Zaharan N, Williams D, Bennett K . Prescribing of antidiabetic therapies in Ireland: 10-year trends 2003-2012. Ir J Med Sci. 2013; 183(2):311-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11845-013-1011-1. View

5.
. Executive summary: Standards of medical care in diabetes--2014. Diabetes Care. 2013; 37 Suppl 1:S5-13. DOI: 10.2337/dc14-S005. View