» Articles » PMID: 27565504

Comparison of Transplant Outcomes and Economic Costs Between Biosimilar and Originator Filgrastim in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Abstract

From January 2012 to September 2015, 49 patients received biosimilar filgrastim (BF) after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT, n = 31) or peripheral stem cell transplantation (PBSCT, n = 18) in our institution. To evaluate the clinical impact of BF on transplant outcomes of these patients, we compared hematological recovery, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), transplantation-related mortality (TRM), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with those of control patients who received originator filgrastim (OF) after BMT (n = 31) or PBSCT (n = 18). All cases were randomly selected from a clinical database in our institution. In both the BMT and PBSCT settings, neutrophil recovery (17 vs. 19 days in BMT; 13 vs. 15 days in PBSCT) and platelet recovery (27 vs. 31 days in BMT; 17 vs. 28 days in PBSCT) were essentially the same between BF and OF. They were also comparable in terms of OS, DFS, TRM, CIR, and the incidence of acute GVHD and chronic GVHD. On multivariate analysis, the use of BF in both BMT and PBSCT was not a significant factor for adverse transplant outcomes. Although BF significantly reduced filgrastim costs in both BMT and PBSCT, total hospitalization costs were not significantly different between BF and OF.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of a biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in Japanese healthy donors: a prospective study.

Sato K, Ishiyama K, Aoki G, Maruyama H, Tsuji N, Tanabe M Int J Hematol. 2019; 110(6):648-653.

PMID: 31542851 DOI: 10.1007/s12185-019-02733-8.


Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WBMT) perspective: the role of biosimilars in hematopoietic cell transplant: current opportunities and challenges in low- and lower-middle income countries.

Muhsen I, Hashmi S, Niederwieser D, Kroeger N, Agrawal S, Pasquini M Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019; 55(4):698-707.

PMID: 31484992 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-019-0658-2.


A single-center, retrospective analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of filgrastim-sndz to filgrastim for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and for neutrophil recovery following autologous stem cell transplantation.

Zecchini J, Yum K, Steinberg A, Smith C, Kim S Support Care Cancer. 2017; 26(3):1013-1016.

PMID: 28990128 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-017-3923-1.

References
1.
Sorgel F, Schwebig A, Holzmann J, Prasch S, Singh P, Kinzig M . Comparability of biosimilar filgrastim with originator filgrastim: protein characterization, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics. BioDrugs. 2015; 29(2):123-31. PMC: 4412827. DOI: 10.1007/s40259-015-0124-7. View

2.
Martin P, Lee S, Przepiorka D, Horowitz M, Koreth J, Vogelsang G . National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: VI. The 2014 Clinical Trial Design Working Group Report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015; 21(8):1343-59. PMC: 4506719. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.05.004. View

3.
Yanada M . Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia during first complete remission: a clinical perspective. Int J Hematol. 2014; 101(3):243-54. DOI: 10.1007/s12185-014-1657-0. View

4.
Marchesi F, Vacca M, Gumenyuk S, Pandolfi A, Renzi D, Palombi F . Biosimilar filgrastim (Zarzio) vs. lenograstim (Myelostim) for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in adult patients with lymphoma and myeloma: a single center experience. Leuk Lymphoma. 2015; 57(2):489-492. DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2015.1063147. View

5.
Uddin S, Russell P, Farrell M, Davy B, Taylor J, Agrawal S . Use of biosimilar filgrastim compared with lenograstim in autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplant and in sibling allogeneic transplant. Ther Adv Hematol. 2015; 6(2):53-60. PMC: 4365052. DOI: 10.1177/2040620714565962. View