» Articles » PMID: 27562649

The Influence of Floral Traits on Specialization and Modularity of Plant-pollinator Networks in a Biodiversity Hotspot in the Peruvian Andes

Overview
Journal Ann Bot
Specialty Biology
Date 2016 Aug 27
PMID 27562649
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Modularity is a ubiquitous and important structural property of ecological networks which describes the relative strengths of sets of interacting species and gives insights into the dynamics of ecological communities. However, this has rarely been studied in species-rich, tropical plant-pollinator networks. Working in a biodiversity hotspot in the Peruvian Andes we assessed the structure of quantitative plant-pollinator networks in nine valleys, quantifying modularity among networks, defining the topological roles of species and the influence of floral traits on specialization.

Methods: A total of 90 transects were surveyed for plants and pollinators at different altitudes and across different life zones. Quantitative modularity (QuanBiMo) was used to detect modularity and six indices were used to quantify specialization.

Key Results: All networks were highly structured, moderately specialized and significantly modular regardless of size. The strongest hubs were Baccharis plants, Apis mellifera, Bombus funebris and Diptera spp., which were the most ubiquitous and abundant species with the longest phenologies. Species strength showed a strong association with the modular structure of plant-pollinator networks. Hubs and connectors were the most centralized participants in the networks and were ranked highest (high generalization) when quantifying specialization with most indices. However, complementary specialization d' quantified hubs and connectors as moderately specialized. Specialization and topological roles of species were remarkably constant across some sites, but highly variable in others. Networks were dominated by ecologically and functionally generalist plant species with open access flowers which are closely related taxonomically with similar morphology and rewards. Plants associated with hummingbirds had the highest level of complementary specialization and exclusivity in modules (functional specialists) and the longest corollas.

Conclusions: We have demonstrated that the topology of networks in this tropical montane environment was non-random and highly organized. Our findings underline that specialization indices convey different concepts of specialization and hence quantify different aspects, and that measuring specialization requires careful consideration of what defines a specialist.

Citing Articles

Elevational and Seasonal Patterns of Plant-Hummingbird Interactions in a High Tropical Mountain.

Senties-Aguilar E, Marten-Rodriguez S, Huerta-Ramos G, Diaz-Infante S, Lopez-Segoviano G, Aguirre-Jaimes A Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(10):e70469.

PMID: 39450155 PMC: 11500213. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70469.


Ecological perspectives on female and male reproductive success with competition in two Serapias species.

Borras J, Cursach J, Herrera C, Perello-Suau S, Capo M Ann Bot. 2024; 134(2):311-324.

PMID: 38712800 PMC: 11232520. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcae074.


The interplay between spatiotemporal overlap and morphology as determinants of microstructure suggests no 'perfect fit' in a bat-flower network.

Diniz U, Aguiar L Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):2737.

PMID: 36792891 PMC: 9932087. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-29965-3.


Different influences of phylogenetically conserved and independent floral traits on plant functional specialization and pollination network structure.

Xiang G, Jiang Y, Lan J, Huang L, Hao L, Liu Z Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1084995.

PMID: 36760631 PMC: 9902514. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1084995.


Interspecific variation in resistance and tolerance to herbicide drift reveals potential consequences for plant community co-flowering interactions and structure at the agro-eco interface.

Iriart V, Baucom R, Ashman T Ann Bot. 2022; 130(7):1015-1028.

PMID: 36415945 PMC: 9851304. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcac137.


References
1.
Bascompte J, Jordano P, Olesen J . Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science. 2006; 312(5772):431-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.1123412. View

2.
Clauset A, Moore C, Newman M . Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks. Nature. 2008; 453(7191):98-101. DOI: 10.1038/nature06830. View

3.
Memmott J, Waser N, Price M . Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions. Proc Biol Sci. 2004; 271(1557):2605-11. PMC: 1691904. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2909. View

4.
Bluthgen N, Frund J, Vazquez D, Menzel F . What do interaction network metrics tell us about specialization and biological traits?. Ecology. 2009; 89(12):3387-99. DOI: 10.1890/07-2121.1. View

5.
Olesen J, Bascompte J, Dupont Y, Jordano P . The modularity of pollination networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(50):19891-6. PMC: 2148393. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0706375104. View