» Articles » PMID: 27562347

High Mobility, Low Access Thwarts Interventions Among Seasonal Workers in the Greater Mekong Sub-region: Lessons from the Malaria Containment Project

Overview
Journal Malar J
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Tropical Medicine
Date 2016 Aug 27
PMID 27562347
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: During the process of malaria elimination in the Greater Mekong Sub-region, mobile and migrant populations (MMPs) have been identified as the most at-risk demographic. An important sub-group of MMPs are seasonal workers, and this paper presents an evaluation of the reach and effectiveness of interventions tailored towards this group and was carried out as part of the Containment Project from 2009-11.

Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted in Pailin Province in Western Cambodia. Three-hundred-and-four seasonal workers were surveyed using a structured questionnaire. Qualitative data were gathered through a total of eight focus group discussions and 14 in-depth interviews. Data triangulation of the qualitative and quantitative data was used during analysis.

Results: High mobility and low access of the target population to the interventions, as well as lack of social and anthropological research that led to implementation oversights, resulted in under-exposure of seasonal workers to interventions. Consequently, their reach and impact were severely limited. Some services, particularly Mobile Malaria Workers, had the ability to significantly impact key factors, such as risky behaviours among those they did reach. Others, like Listening and Viewing Clubs and mass media campaigns, showed little impact.

Conclusions: There is potential in two of the interventions assessed, but high mobility and inadequate exposure of seasonal workers to these interventions must be considered in the development and planning of future interventions to avoid investing in low-impact activities and ensure that all interventions perform according to their maximum potential. This will be critical in order for Cambodia to achieve its aim of malaria elimination. The lessons learned from this study can be extrapolated to other areas of health care in Cambodia and other countries in order to reduce the gap between healthcare provided to MMPs, especially seasonal workers, and to the general population.

Citing Articles

Successful elimination of falciparum malaria following the introduction of community-based health workers in Eastern Myanmar: A retrospective analysis.

Zaw A, Win E, Yan S, Thein K, Verma V, McLean A PLoS Med. 2023; 20(11):e1004318.

PMID: 38033155 PMC: 10721164. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004318.


Comparison of deforestation and forest land use factors for malaria elimination in Myanmar.

Hoffman-Hall A, Puett R, Silva J, Chen D, Bredder A, Shevade V IJID Reg. 2023; 8:75-83.

PMID: 37533552 PMC: 10393544. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2023.06.006.


Cross-border malaria drivers and risk factors on the Brazil-Venezuela border between 2016 and 2018.

Wangdi K, Wetzler E, Marchesini P, Villegas L, Canavati S Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):6058.

PMID: 35411064 PMC: 9001644. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09819-0.


The use of respondent‑driven sampling to assess febrile illness treatment-seeking behaviours among forest-goers in Cambodia and Vietnam.

Paudel M, Tesfazghi K, Nguyen H, Phok S, Srinivasan S, Wheeler J Malar J. 2021; 20(1):477.

PMID: 34930264 PMC: 8686608. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-021-04001-9.


Malaria prevention and treatment in migrant agricultural workers in Dangur district, Benishangul-Gumuz, Ethiopia: social and behavioural aspects.

Tadesse Y, Irish S, Chibsa S, Dugassa S, Lorenz L, Gebreyohannes A Malar J. 2021; 20(1):224.

PMID: 34011347 PMC: 8135166. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-021-03766-3.


References
1.
Liu A, Sullivan S, Khan M, Sachs S, Singh P . Community health workers in global health: scale and scalability. Mt Sinai J Med. 2011; 78(3):419-35. DOI: 10.1002/msj.20260. View

2.
Ruebush 2nd T, Zeissig R, Koplan J, Klein R, Godoy H . Community participation in malaria surveillance and treatment. III. An evaluation of modifications in the Volunteer Collaborator Network of Guatemala. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1994; 50(1):85-98. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.1994.50.85. View

3.
Blanas D, Ndiaye Y, Nichols K, Jensen A, Siddiqui A, Hennig N . Barriers to community case management of malaria in Saraya, Senegal: training, and supply-chains. Malar J. 2013; 12:95. PMC: 3607880. DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-95. View

4.
Yeung S, Van Damme W, Socheat D, White N, Mills A . Access to artemisinin combination therapy for malaria in remote areas of Cambodia. Malar J. 2008; 7:96. PMC: 2430580. DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-96. View

5.
Guyant P, Canavati S, Chea N, Ly P, Whittaker M, Roca-Feltrer A . Malaria and the mobile and migrant population in Cambodia: a population movement framework to inform strategies for malaria control and elimination. Malar J. 2015; 14:252. PMC: 4474346. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-015-0773-5. View