» Articles » PMID: 27556603

Phalloplasty: A Review of Techniques and Outcomes

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2016 Aug 25
PMID 27556603
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Acquired or congenital absence of the penis can lead to severe physical limitations and psychological outcomes. Phallic reconstruction can restore various functional aspects of the penis and reduce psychosocial sequelae. Moreover, some female-to-male transsexuals desire creation of a phallus as part of their gender transition. Because of the complexity of phalloplasty, there is not an ideal technique for every patient. This review sets out to identify and critically appraise the current literature on phalloplasty techniques and outcomes.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search of the MEDLINE, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases was conducted for studies published through July of 2015 with multiple search terms related to phalloplasty. Data on techniques, outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction were collected.

Results: A total of 248 articles were selected and reviewed from the 790 identified. Articles covered a variety of techniques on phalloplasty. Three thousand two hundred thirty-eight patients underwent phalloplasty, with a total of 1753 complications reported, although many articles did not explicitly comment on complications. One hundred four patients underwent penile replantation and two underwent penile transplantation. Satisfaction was high, although most studies did not use validated or quantified approaches to address satisfaction.

Conclusions: Phalloplasty techniques are evolving to include a number of different flaps, and most techniques have high reported satisfaction rates. Penile replantation and transplantation are also options for amputation or loss of phallus. Further studies are required to better compare different techniques to more robustly establish best practices. However, based on these studies, it appears that phalloplasty is highly efficacious and beneficial to patients.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Lateral Triangular Flaps When Combined With Bilateral Superficial Epigastric Artery Flap for Shaft-only Penile Reconstruction.

Mohamed A, Hafez Hamza A, Hussein M Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025; 13(2):e6485.

PMID: 40008376 PMC: 11856887. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006485.


Penile Reconstruction with Radial Forearm Free Flap-Present State of the Art.

Jain V, S S, G S, Guin D, Gupta S, Murarka A Indian J Plast Surg. 2025; 57(Suppl 1):S58-S64.

PMID: 39741729 PMC: 11684908. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791195.


Experimental Models in Penile Transplantation: Translational Insights and Relevance to Clinical Application.

Kodali N, Janarthanan R, Sazoglu B, Demir Z, Dirican O, Kulahci Y Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e74258.

PMID: 39712689 PMC: 11663459. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.74258.


Impact of Gender-confirming Chest Surgery on Sexual Health: A Prospective Study.

de Schoulepnikoff C, Bauquis O, di Summa P Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12(8):e6014.

PMID: 39534071 PMC: 11557040. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006014.


Functionality and Scar Evaluation of the Donor Site in Extended Radial Forearm Flap Phalloplasty: How Affected Is the Arm in Day-to-Day Life?.

Ozturk M, Wellenbrock S, Wiebringhaus P, Aitzetmuller-Klietz M, Kuenzlen L, Burger A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(19).

PMID: 39408064 PMC: 11477785. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13196004.