» Articles » PMID: 27554865

The Psychometric Properties of the Ages & Stages Questionnaires for Ages 2-2.5: a Systematic Review

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2016 Aug 25
PMID 27554865
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Early identification of children with potential development delay is essential to ensure access to care. The Ages & Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) is used as population outcome indicators in England as part of the 2.5-year review.

Method: The aim of this article was to systematically review the worldwide evidence for the psychometric properties of the ASQ third edition (ASQ-3 ) and the Ages & Stages Questionnaires®: Social-Emotional (ASQ:SE). Eight electronic databases and grey literature were searched for original research studies available in English language, which reported reliability, validity or responsiveness of the ASQ-3 or ASQ:SE for children aged between 2 and 2.5 years. Twenty studies were included. Eligible studies used either the ASQ-3 or the ASQ:SE and reported at least one measurement property of the ASQ-3 and/or ASQ:SE. Data were extracted from all papers identified for final inclusion, drawing on Cochrane guidelines.

Results: Using 'positive', 'intermediate' and 'negative' criteria for evaluating psychometric properties, results showed 'positive' reliability values in 11/18 instances reported, 'positive' sensitivity values in 13/18 instances reported and 'positive' specificity values in 19/19 instances reported.

Conclusions: Variations in age or language versions used, quality of psychometric properties and quality of papers resulted in heterogeneous evidence. It is important to consider differences in cultural and contextual factors when measuring child development using these indicators. Further research is very likely to have an important impact on the interpretation of the ASQ-3 and ASQ:SE psychometric evidence.

Citing Articles

Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of ages and stages questionnaire social-emotional: second edition for parents of children 18 months of age.

Edenius A, Bergstrom M, Lindberg L, Bergqvist K, Frojlinger A, Enebrink P BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):564.

PMID: 39420383 PMC: 11487771. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-01996-z.


Establishing the reliability of metrics extracted from long-form recordings using LENA and the ACLEW pipeline.

Cristia A, Gautheron L, Zhang Z, Schuller B, Scaff C, Rowland C Behav Res Methods. 2024; 56(8):8588-8607.

PMID: 39304601 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02493-2.


Clinical utility and psychometric properties of tools for early detection of developmental concerns and disability in young children: A scoping review.

Burgess A, Luke C, Jackman M, Wotherspoon J, Whittingham K, Benfer K Dev Med Child Neurol. 2024; 67(3):286-306.

PMID: 39285306 PMC: 11794681. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.16076.


Cultural adaptation, validation, and standardization of a developmental screening tool (ASQ-3) in Iranian children.

Shariatpanahi G, Vameghi R, Ghanbari N, Barekati S, Lornejad H, Abolghasemi N Iran J Child Neurol. 2024; 18(2):55-71.

PMID: 38617393 PMC: 11015726. DOI: 10.22037/ijcn.v18i2.39595.


A randomized trial of the Caregiver Interaction Profile (CIP) training with childcare providers: the Copenhagen Daycare Project study protocol.

Reijman S, Christensen Vieira C, Wahl Haase T, Helmerhorst K, Pontoppidan M, Grosen S BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):127.

PMID: 38449031 PMC: 10918888. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-01568-1.