» Articles » PMID: 27552268

State-Level Voting Patterns and Adolescent Vaccination Coverage in the United States, 2014

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2016 Aug 24
PMID 27552268
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To examine state-level associations between voting patterns and adolescent coverage for at least 1 dose of human papillomavirus (HPV), tetanus-containing (Tdap), and meningococcal (MCV4) vaccination.

Methods: We classified states as "blue" (Democratic affiliation) or "red" (Republican affiliation) based on the Presidential election results in 2012. We used multivariable models to adjust for potential confounding by sociodemographic and health care access characteristics and vaccination policies. For HPV, separate models were fitted for boys and girls.

Results: Adolescent vaccination coverage was significantly higher in blue states than red states for each vaccine (P < .05). The adjusted percent differences between blue and red states were 10.2% for HPV among girls, 24.9% for HPV among boys, 6.2% for tetanus-containing vaccine, and 14.1% for MCV4.

Conclusions: State-level voting patterns are independently and significantly associated with coverage for routinely recommended adolescent vaccines. These differences may reflect population-level differences in cultural norms and social values.

Public Health Implications: Strategies to increase coverage at the individual, community, or structural level should consider local political settings that may facilitate or hinder effectiveness.

Citing Articles

The influence of political ideology on awareness of HPV and HPV vaccine among adults in the United States.

Chido-Amajuoyi O, Onyeaka H, Amonoo H, Shete S Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023; 19(2):2232706.

PMID: 37529922 PMC: 10399468. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2232706.


The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Meningococcal Vaccination Awareness, Delivery, and Coverage in Adolescents and Young Adults in the United States: A Systematic Review.

Masaquel C, Schley K, Wright K, Mauskopf J, Alexander Parrish R, Presa J Vaccines (Basel). 2023; 11(2).

PMID: 36851134 PMC: 9962690. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11020256.


The harmful effects of partisan polarization on health.

Fraser T, Aldrich D, Panagopoulos C, Hummel D, Kim D PNAS Nexus. 2023; 1(1):pgac011.

PMID: 36712795 PMC: 9802430. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac011.


Hesitancy or Resistance? Differential Changes in COVID-19 Vaccination Intention Between Black and White Americans.

Morales D, Paat Y J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022; 11(1):23-35.

PMID: 36547772 PMC: 9774084. DOI: 10.1007/s40615-022-01494-1.


Reliability but not bias: Developing a scale to measure preferred channels for risk information during the COVID pandemic.

Lachlan K, Gilbert C Risk Anal. 2022; 43(7):1329-1338.

PMID: 36167474 PMC: 9538727. DOI: 10.1111/risa.14035.


References
1.
Seither R, Masalovich S, Knighton C, Mellerson J, Singleton J, Greby S . Vaccination coverage among children in kindergarten - United States, 2013-14 school year. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014; 63(41):913-20. PMC: 4584748. View

2.
Blank N, Caplan A, Constable C . Exempting schoolchildren from immunizations: states with few barriers had highest rates of nonmedical exemptions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013; 32(7):1282-90. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0239. View

3.
Elam-Evans L, Yankey D, Jeyarajah J, Singleton J, Curtis R, MacNeil J . National, regional, state, and selected local area vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13-17 years--United States, 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014; 63(29):625-33. PMC: 5779424. View

4.
Kimball R, Wissner M . Religion, Poverty, and Politics: Their Impact on Women's Reproductive Health Outcomes. Public Health Nurs. 2015; 32(6):598-612. DOI: 10.1111/phn.12196. View

5.
Bradford W, Mandich A . Some state vaccination laws contribute to greater exemption rates and disease outbreaks in the United States. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015; 34(8):1383-90. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1428. View