Understanding Factors That Facilitate the Inclusion of Pain Education in Undergraduate Curricula: Perspectives from a UK Survey

Overview

Journal Br J Pain

Date 2016 Aug 24

PMID 27551420

Citations 7

Authors

Eloise Cj Carr

Emma V Briggs

Michelle Briggs

Nick Allcock

Pauline Black

Derek Jones

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Studies in Europe, North America and Australasia suggest that one in five adults suffer from pain. There is increasing recognition that pain, particularly chronic pain, represents a global health burden. Many studies, including two national surveys exploring the content of undergraduate curricula for pain education, identify that documented pain education in curricula was limited and fragmentary.

Methods: The study design used a questionnaire which included an open text comment box for respondents to add 'further comments' as part of larger study previously published. The sample consisted of 19 UK universities that offered 108 undergraduate programmes in the following: dentistry, medicine, midwifery, nursing (adult, child, learning disabilities and mental health branches), occupational therapy (OT), pharmacy, physiotherapy and veterinary science. An inductive content analysis was performed, and the data were managed using NVivo 10 software for data management.

Results: A total of 57 participants across seven disciplines (dentistry, medicine, midwifery, nursing, pharmacy, physiotherapy and OT) completed the open text comment box (none were received from veterinary science). Analysis revealed two major themes of successes and challenges. Successes included expansion (extending coverage and/or increased student access), multidimensional curriculum content and diversity of teaching methods. Challenges included difficulties in identifying where pain is taught in the curriculum, biomedical versus biopsychosocial definitions of pain, perceived importance, time, resources and staff knowledge, and finally a diffusion of responsibility for pain education.

Conclusion: This study identifies new insights of the factors attributed to successful implementation of pain education in undergraduate education. Many of the challenges previously reported were also identified. This is one of the first studies to identify a broad range of approaches, for pain education, that could be deemed as 'successful' across a range of health disciplines.

Citing Articles

Confidence of practitioners to support self-management of pain: A multidisciplinary survey.

Penlington C, Pornsukjantra P, Chazot P, Cole F, Denneny D Br J Pain. 2024; 18(2):148-154.

PMID: 38545504 PMC: 10964858. DOI: 10.1177/20494637231212748.

The Pain Medicine Curriculum Framework-structured integration of pain medicine education into the medical curriculum.

Shipton E, Steketee C, Visser E Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023; 3:1057114.

PMID: 36700142 PMC: 9869177. DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2022.1057114.

Dealing with Chronic Pain: Tips to Teach Undergraduate Health Sciences Students.

Hernandez-Sanchez S, Poveda-Pagan E, Toledo-Marhuenda J, Lozano-Quijada C J Pain Res. 2022; 15:3223-3232.

PMID: 36281308 PMC: 9587724. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S377124.

Rethinking pain education from the perspectives of people experiencing pain: a meta-ethnography to inform physiotherapy training.

Thompson K, Johnson M, Milligan J, Briggs M BMJ Open. 2022; 12(1):e046363.

PMID: 35017228 PMC: 8753399. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046363.

Challenges and visions for managing pain-related insomnia in primary care using the hybrid CBT approach: a small-scale qualitative interview study with GPs, nurses, and practice managers.

Collard V, Moore C, Nichols V, Ellard D, Patel S, Sandhu H BMC Fam Pract. 2021; 22(1):210.

PMID: 34666682 PMC: 8527665. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01552-3.

References

Sandelowski M . Rigor or rigor mortis: the problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1993; 16(2):1-8. DOI: 10.1097/00012272-199312000-00002. View

Thistlethwaite J . Interprofessional education: a review of context, learning and the research agenda. Med Educ. 2011; 46(1):58-70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04143.x. View

Zanolin M, Visentin M, Trentin L, Saiani L, Brugnolli A, Grassi M . A questionnaire to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of health care providers on pain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007; 33(6):727-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.09.032. View

Brennan F, Carr D, Cousins M . Pain management: a fundamental human right. Anesth Analg. 2007; 105(1):205-21. DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000268145.52345.55. View

Watt-Watson J, Carr E, McGillion M . Moving the pain education agenda forward: innovative models. Pain Res Manag. 2011; 16(6):401. PMC: 3298053. DOI: 10.1155/2011/219621. View

McKinnon L, Prosser S, Miller Y . What women want: qualitative analysis of consumer evaluations of maternity care in Queensland, Australia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14:366. PMC: 4216658. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-014-0366-2. View

Visentin M, Trentin L, De Marco R, Zanolin E . Knowledge and attitudes of Italian medical staff towards the approach and treatment of patients in pain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001; 22(5):925-30. DOI: 10.1016/s0885-3924(01)00355-4. View

Tamas R, Miller K, Martin L, Greenberg R . Addressing patient sexual orientation in the undergraduate medical education curriculum. Acad Psychiatry. 2010; 34(5):342-5. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ap.34.5.342. View

Murinson B, Gordin V, Flynn S, Driver L, Gallagher R, Grabois M . Recommendations for a new curriculum in pain medicine for medical students: toward a career distinguished by competence and compassion. Pain Med. 2013; 14(3):345-50. PMC: 6069634. DOI: 10.1111/pme.12051. View

10.

Suter E, Arndt J, Arthur N, Parboosingh J, Taylor E, Deutschlander S . Role understanding and effective communication as core competencies for collaborative practice. J Interprof Care. 2009; 23(1):41-51. DOI: 10.1080/13561820802338579. View

11.

Keefe G, Wharrad H . Using e-learning to enhance nursing students' pain management education. Nurse Educ Today. 2012; 32(8):e66-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.03.018. View

12.

OCathain A, Thomas K . "Any other comments?" Open questions on questionnaires - a bane or a bonus to research?. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004; 4:25. PMC: 533875. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-4-25. View

13.

Elo S, Kyngas H . The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008; 62(1):107-15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x. View

14.

Briggs E, Carr E, Whittaker M . Survey of undergraduate pain curricula for healthcare professionals in the United Kingdom. Eur J Pain. 2011; 15(8):789-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.01.006. View

15.

Ury W, Reznich C, Weber C . A needs assessment for a palliative care curriculum. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000; 20(6):408-16. DOI: 10.1016/s0885-3924(00)00217-7. View

16.

Bollard M, Lahiff J, Parkes N . Involving people with learning disabilities in nurse education: towards an inclusive approach. Nurse Educ Today. 2011; 32(2):173-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.10.002. View

17.

Rhodes C . User involvement in health and social care education: a concept analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2011; 32(2):185-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.11.012. View

18.

Mezei L, Murinson B . Pain education in North American medical schools. J Pain. 2011; 12(12):1199-208. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.06.006. View

19.

Gibbins J, McCoubrie R, Maher J, Forbes K . Incorporating palliative care into undergraduate curricula: lessons for curriculum development. Med Educ. 2009; 43(8):776-83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03400.x. View

20.

Eriksen J, Jensen M, Sjogren P, Ekholm O, Rasmussen N . Epidemiology of chronic non-malignant pain in Denmark. Pain. 2003; 106(3):221-228. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00225-2. View