» Articles » PMID: 27551387

Incipient Sympatric Speciation in Midas Cichlid Fish from the Youngest and One of the Smallest Crater Lakes in Nicaragua Due to Differential Use of the Benthic and Limnetic Habitats?

Overview
Journal Ecol Evol
Date 2016 Aug 24
PMID 27551387
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Understanding how speciation can occur without geographic isolation remains a central objective in evolutionary biology. Generally, some form of disruptive selection and assortative mating are necessary for sympatric speciation to occur. Disruptive selection can arise from intraspecific competition for resources. If this competition leads to the differential use of habitats and variation in relevant traits is genetically determined, then assortative mating can be an automatic consequence (i.e., habitat isolation). In this study, we caught Midas cichlid fish from the limnetic (middle of the lake) and benthic (shore) habitats of Crater Lake Asososca Managua to test whether some of the necessary conditions for sympatric speciation due to intraspecific competition and habitat isolation are given. Lake As. Managua is very small (<900 m in diameter), extremely young (maximally 1245 years of age), and completely isolated. It is inhabited by, probably, only a single endemic species of Midas cichlids, Amphilophus tolteca. We found that fish from the limnetic habitat were more elongated than fish collected from the benthic habitat, as would be predicted from ecomorphological considerations. Stable isotope analyses confirmed that the former also exhibit a more limnetic lifestyle than the latter. Furthermore, split-brood design experiments in the laboratory suggest that phenotypic plasticity is unlikely to explain much of the observed differences in body elongation that we observed in the field. Yet, neutral markers (microsatellites) did not reveal any genetic clustering in the population. Interestingly, demographic inferences based on RAD-seq data suggest that the apparent lack of genetic differentiation at neutral markers could simply be due to a lack of time, as intraspecific competition may only have begun a few hundred generations ago.

Citing Articles

Early stages of sympatric homoploid hybrid speciation in crater lake cichlid fishes.

Olave M, Nater A, Kautt A, Meyer A Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):5893.

PMID: 36202802 PMC: 9537415. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33319-4.


Divergent and non-parallel evolution of MHC IIB in the Neotropical Midas cichlid species complex.

Bracamonte S, Hofmann M, Lozano-Martin C, Eizaguirre C, Barluenga M BMC Ecol Evol. 2022; 22(1):41.

PMID: 35365100 PMC: 8974093. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-022-01997-9.


The macroparasite fauna of cichlid fish from Nicaraguan lakes, a model system for understanding host-parasite diversification and speciation.

Santacruz A, Barluenga M, Perez-Ponce de Leon G Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):3944.

PMID: 35273219 PMC: 8913791. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-07647-w.


Taxonomic assessment of the genus Procamallanus (Nematoda) in Middle American cichlids (Osteichthyes) with molecular data, and the description of a new species from Nicaragua and Costa Rica.

Santacruz A, Barluenga M, Perez-Ponce de Leon G Parasitol Res. 2021; 120(6):1965-1977.

PMID: 33851247 DOI: 10.1007/s00436-021-07148-1.


Ecological speciation in European whitefish is driven by a large-gaped predator.

Ohlund G, Bodin M, Nilsson K, Ohlund S, Mobley K, Hudson A Evol Lett. 2020; 4(3):243-256.

PMID: 32547784 PMC: 7293097. DOI: 10.1002/evl3.167.


References
1.
Noack K, Wilson A, Meyer A . Broad taxonomic applicability of microsatellites developed for the highly polymorphic neotropical cichlid, Amphilophus citrinellum. Anim Genet. 2000; 31(2):151-2. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2052.2000.00592.x. View

2.
Pritchard J, Stephens M, Donnelly P . Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000; 155(2):945-59. PMC: 1461096. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/155.2.945. View

3.
Rieseberg L . Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001; 16(7):351-358. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02187-5. View

4.
Gavrilets S . Perspective: models of speciation: what have we learned in 40 years?. Evolution. 2003; 57(10):2197-215. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00233.x. View

5.
Peres-Neto P, Magnan P . The influence of swimming demand on phenotypic plasticity and morphological integration: a comparison of two polymorphic charr species. Oecologia. 2004; 140(1):36-45. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1562-y. View