Robots Drive the German Radical Prostatectomy Market: a Total Population Analysis from 2006 to 2013

Overview

Journal Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis

Specialties Oncology
Urology

Date 2016 Aug 24

PMID 27549566

Citations 13

Authors

C Groeben

R Koch

M Baunacke

M P Wirth

J Huber

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: To assess trends in the distribution of patients for radical prostatectomy in Germany from 2006 to 2013 and the impact of robotic surgery on annual caseloads. We hypothesized that the advent of robotics and the establishment of certified prostate cancer centers caused centralization in the German radical prostatectomy market.

Methods: Using remote data processing we analyzed the nationwide German billing data from 2006 to 2013. We supplemented this database with additional hospital characteristics like the prostate cancer center certification status. Inclusion criteria were a prostate cancer diagnosis combined with radical prostatectomy. Hospitals with certification or a surgical robot in 2009 were defined as 'early' group. Linear covariant-analytic models were applied to describe trends over time.

Results: Annual radical prostatectomy numbers declined from 28 374 (2006) to 21 850 (2013). High-volume hospitals (⩾100 cases) decreased from 87 (22.0%) in 2006 to 43 (10.4%) in 2013. Low-volume hospitals (<50 cases) increased from 193 (48.7%) to 280 (67.4%). Mean radical prostatectomy caseloads of hospitals with early vs without certification declined from 155 to 130 vs 77 to 39 (P=0.021 for trend comparison). Early robotic hospitals maintained their volume >200 cases per year contrary to the overall trend (P<0.001 for trend comparison). A multivariate model for caseload numbers of 2013 indicated a robotic system to be the most important factor for higher caseloads (multiplication factor 7.3; 95% confidence interval: 6.6-8.0). A prostate cancer center certification (multiplication factor 1.6; 95% confidence interval: 1.50-1.59) had a much smaller impact.

Conclusions: We found decentralization of radical prostatectomy in Germany. The driving force for this development might consist in the overall decline of radical prostatectomy numbers. The most important factor for achieving higher caseloads was the presence of a robotic system. In order to optimize outcomes of radical prostatectomy additional health policy measures might be necessary.

Citing Articles

Information Behaviour and Knowledge of Patients Before Radical Prostatectomy.

Hirtsiefer C, Vogelgesang A, Falkenbach F, Kafka M, Uhlig A, Nestler T Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 39858082 PMC: 11764233. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17020300.

The use of laser-assisted cart positioning significantly reduces the docking time of multimodular robotic systems.

Baunacke M, Hirtsiefer C, Herout R, Mehralivand S, Oelkers S, Kaske O J Robot Surg. 2025; 19(1):46.

PMID: 39762685 PMC: 11703870. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02196-y.

Defining a threshold for safe surgical management of vena cava thrombus in renal cell carcinoma patients: evidence from German total population data with 3,700 cases from 2006 to 2020.

Martin T, Huber J, Koch R, Butea-Bocu M, Haak L, Flegar L World J Urol. 2024; 43(1):1.

PMID: 39611968 PMC: 11606981. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05360-z.

Robotic-assisted surgery for prostatectomy - does the diffusion of robotic systems contribute to treatment centralization and influence patients' hospital choice?.

Kuklinski D, Vogel J, Henschke C, Pross C, Geissler A Health Econ Rev. 2023; 13(1):29.

PMID: 37162648 PMC: 10170785. DOI: 10.1186/s13561-023-00444-9.

Hospital rating websites play a minor role for uro-oncologic patients when choosing a hospital for major surgery: results of the German multicenter NAVIGATOR-study.

Groeben C, Boehm K, Koch R, Sonntag U, Nestler T, Struck J World J Urol. 2023; 41(2):601-609.

PMID: 36633651 PMC: 9947074. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04271-1.

References

Trinh Q, Bjartell A, Freedland S, Hollenbeck B, Hu J, Shariat S . A systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2013; 64(5):786-98. PMC: 4109273. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.04.012. View

Begg C, Riedel E, Bach P, Kattan M, Schrag D, Warren J . Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(15):1138-44. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa011788. View

Hager B, Kraywinkel K, Keck B, Katalinic A, Meyer M, Zeissig S . Integrated prostate cancer centers might cause an overutilization of radiotherapy for low-risk prostate cancer: A comparison of treatment trends in the United States and Germany from 2004 to 2011. Radiother Oncol. 2015; 115(1):90-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.02.024. View

Peschke D, Nimptsch U, Mansky T . Achieving minimum caseload requirements--an analysis of hospital discharge data from 2005-2011. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014; 111(33-34):556-63. PMC: 4165183. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0556. View

Ritch C, Graves A, Keegan K, Ni S, Bassett J, Chang S . Increasing use of observation among men at low risk for prostate cancer mortality. J Urol. 2014; 193(3):801-6. PMC: 4363002. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.08.102. View

Trinh Q, Sammon J, Sun M, Ravi P, Ghani K, Bianchi M . Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur Urol. 2011; 61(4):679-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.027. View

Cathcart P, Sridhara A, Ramachandran N, Briggs T, Nathan S, Kelly J . Achieving Quality Assurance of Prostate Cancer Surgery During Reorganisation of Cancer Services. Eur Urol. 2015; 68(1):22-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.028. View

Barocas D, Mitchell R, Chang S, Cookson M . Impact of surgeon and hospital volume on outcomes of radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol. 2009; 28(3):243-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.03.001. View

Basto M, Sathianathen N, Te Marvelde L, Ryan S, Goad J, Lawrentschuk N . Patterns-of-care and health economic analysis of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Australian public health system. BJU Int. 2015; 117(6):930-9. DOI: 10.1111/bju.13317. View

10.

Gilbert S, Dunn R, Miller D, Daignault S, Ye Z, Hollenbeck B . Mortality after urologic cancer surgery: impact of non-index case volume. Urology. 2008; 71(5):906-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.035. View

11.

Hanchanale V, McCabe J, Javle P . Radical prostatectomy practice in England. Urol J. 2010; 7(4):243-8. View

12.

Ramirez A, Benayoun S, Briganti A, Chun J, Perrotte P, Kattan M . High radical prostatectomy surgical volume is related to lower radical prostatectomy total hospital charges. Eur Urol. 2006; 50(1):58-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.02.066. View

13.

Chang S, Kibel A, Brooks J, Chung B . The impact of robotic surgery on the surgical management of prostate cancer in the USA. BJU Int. 2014; 115(6):929-36. DOI: 10.1111/bju.12850. View

14.

Weeks W, Paraponaris A, Ventelou B . Geographic variation in rates of common surgical procedures in France in 2008-2010, and comparison to the US and Britain. Health Policy. 2014; 118(2):215-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.08.015. View

15.

Kalble T, Fichtner J . [Treatment quality of prostate cancer centers. Analysis of the 2014 annual report of the German Cancer Society]. Urologe A. 2015; 54(11):1523-4, 1526-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00120-015-3994-x. View

16.

Huber J, Groeben C, Wirth M, Hoffmann F . [Minimum caseload requirements in urologic oncology: not without evidence from health services research]. Urologe A. 2014; 53(12):1753-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00120-014-3706-y. View

17.

Ellison L, Heaney J, Birkmeyer J . The effect of hospital volume on mortality and resource use after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2000; 163(3):867-9. View

18.

Benchimol E, Smeeth L, Guttmann A, Harron K, Moher D, Petersen I . The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement. PLoS Med. 2015; 12(10):e1001885. PMC: 4595218. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885. View

19.

Fichtner J, Kowalski C, Wesselmann S, Albers P . [Indicator analysis of prostate cancer centers certified by the German Cancer Society 2015]. Urologe A. 2015; 54(11):1530, 1532-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00120-015-3855-7. View

20.

Hanchanale V, Javle P . Impact of hospital provider volume on outcome for radical urological cancer surgery in England. Urol Int. 2010; 85(1):11-5. DOI: 10.1159/000318631. View