Does Cardiac Rehabilitation Favour the Young over the Old?

Overview

Journal Open Heart

Publisher BMJ Publishing Group

Specialty Cardiology & Vascular Diseases

Date 2016 Aug 23

PMID 27547435

Citations 5

Authors

Abdulrahman Al Quait

Patrick Doherty

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Although cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a proven intervention in reducing cardiovascular mortality and morbidity there is concern that CR programme delivery may not yield comparable outcomes across age groups.

Purpose: This study sought to determine if the outcomes achieved after completing CR were influenced by age in patients with coronary heart disease.

Method: Patients were stratified into 2 age groups: young (18-65 years) and elderly (>65 years). Pre-CR and post-CR assessments were used to compute changes in 9 CR outcomes (body mass index (BMI), waist size, hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, smoking, walking fitness, physical activity, anxiety and depression). Pearson's χ(2) test was used to examine the association between the age groups and outcome. Data was extracted from the UK National Audit from July 2010 to June 2015.

Results: A total of 203 012 young patients (55.1±7.9 years, 78% male) and 262 813 elderly patients (76.1±6.9 years, 63.9% male) were analysed. Young patients had a better ratio of improvement across a wide range of risk factors in particular smoking cessation (OR=3.3, p<0.001) while elderly patients had a better ratio of improvement in body shape risk factors BMI (OR=1.3, p<0.001), waist size in women (OR=1.3, p=0.016).

Conclusions: Age is a significant predictor of outcomes following CR. While elderly patients achieve better outcomes in body shape risk factors, younger patients clearly achieve better outcomes across a wider range of risk factors in particular smoking cessation.

Citing Articles

A Comparison Between Cardiac Telerehabilitation Program and Outpatient Hospital-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program for Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery: A Review.

Puri S, Lalwani L Cureus. 2023; 15(11):e48488.

PMID: 38073989 PMC: 10704402. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.48488.

Implementation of an Appointment-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Approach: A Single-Center Experience.

Wright C, Fournier S, Deng Y, Meng C, Hiller S, Oen-Hsiao J J Am Heart Assoc. 2022; 11(9):e024066.

PMID: 35499969 PMC: 9238587. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024066.

Cardiovascular rehabilitation in patients aged 70-year-old or older: benefits on functional capacity, physical activity and metabolic profile in younger . older patients.

Fontes-Oliveira M, Trepa M, Rodrigues P, Fernandes P, Magalhaes S, Cabral S J Geriatr Cardiol. 2020; 17(9):544-553.

PMID: 33117418 PMC: 7568038. DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2020.09.003.

Predictors of cardiorespiratory fitness improvement in phase II cardiac rehabilitation.

Abu-Haniyeh A, Shah N, Wu Y, Cho L, Ahmed H Clin Cardiol. 2018; 41(12):1563-1569.

PMID: 30350419 PMC: 6489768. DOI: 10.1002/clc.23101.

In the modern era of percutaneous coronary intervention: Is cardiac rehabilitation engagement purely a patient or a service level decision?.

Al Quait A, Doherty P, Gutacker N, Mills J Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017; 24(13):1351-1357.

PMID: 28633533 PMC: 5574495. DOI: 10.1177/2047487317717064.

References

Lawler P, Filion K, Eisenberg M . Efficacy of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation post-myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Heart J. 2011; 162(4):571-584.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.07.017. View

Anderson L, Oldridge N, Thompson D, Zwisler A, Rees K, Martin N . Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart Disease: Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.044. View

Cooper A, Jackson G, Weinman J, Horne R . Factors associated with cardiac rehabilitation attendance: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil. 2002; 16(5):541-52. DOI: 10.1191/0269215502cr524oa. View

Houchen-Wolloff L, Boyce S, Singh S . The minimum clinically important improvement in the incremental shuttle walk test following cardiac rehabilitation. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014; 22(8):972-8. DOI: 10.1177/2047487314540840. View

Barber K, Stommel M, Kroll J, Holmes-Rovner M, McIntosh B . Cardiac rehabilitation for community-based patients with myocardial infarction: factors predicting discharge recommendation and participation. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001; 54(10):1025-30. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00375-4. View

Brown T, Hernandez A, Bittner V, Cannon C, Ellrodt G, Liang L . Predictors of cardiac rehabilitation referral in coronary artery disease patients: findings from the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines Program. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 54(6):515-21. PMC: 2760436. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.080. View

Wenger N . Current status of cardiac rehabilitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 51(17):1619-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.01.030. View

Shenoy C, Patel M . Improved fitness as a measure of success of cardiac rehabilitation: do those who get fitter live longer?. Int J Cardiol. 2012; 167(3):903-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.11.044. View

Menezes A, Lavie C, Forman D, Arena R, Milani R, Franklin B . Cardiac rehabilitation in the elderly. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014; 57(2):152-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2014.01.002. View

10.

Dunlay S, Witt B, Allison T, Hayes S, Weston S, Koepsell E . Barriers to participation in cardiac rehabilitation. Am Heart J. 2009; 158(5):852-9. PMC: 2778257. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.08.010. View

11.

Doherty P, Harrison A, Knapton M, Dale V . Observational study of the relationship between volume and outcomes using data from the National Audit of Cardiac Rehabilitation. Open Heart. 2015; 2(1):e000304. PMC: 4654095. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000304. View

12.

Dalal H, Doherty P, Taylor R . Cardiac rehabilitation. BMJ. 2015; 351:h5000. PMC: 4586722. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h5000. View

13.

Sandercock G, Hurtado V, Cardoso F . Changes in cardiorespiratory fitness in cardiac rehabilitation patients: a meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2011; 167(3):894-902. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.11.068. View

14.

Audelin M, Savage P, Ades P . Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for very old patients (> or =75 years): focus on physical function. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2008; 28(3):163-73. DOI: 10.1097/01.HCR.0000320066.58599.e5. View

15.

Yohannes A, Yalfani A, Doherty P, Bundy C . Predictors of drop-out from an outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programme. Clin Rehabil. 2007; 21(3):222-9. DOI: 10.1177/0269215506070771. View

16.

Szumilas M . Explaining odds ratios. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010; 19(3):227-9. PMC: 2938757. View

17.

Lavie C, Milani R . Adverse psychological and coronary risk profiles in young patients with coronary artery disease and benefits of formal cardiac rehabilitation. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166(17):1878-83. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.17.1878. View

18.

Ades P, Savage P, Harvey-Berino J . The treatment of obesity in cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2010; 30(5):289-98. PMC: 2917500. DOI: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181d6f9a8. View

19.

Piepoli M, Corra U, Abreu A, Cupples M, Davos C, Doherty P . Challenges in secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases: a review of the current practice. Int J Cardiol. 2014; 180:114-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.11.107. View

20.

Bader D, Maguire T, Spahn C, OMALLEY C, Balady G . Clinical profile and outcomes of obese patients in cardiac rehabilitation stratified according to National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute criteria. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2001; 21(4):210-7. DOI: 10.1097/00008483-200107000-00003. View