» Articles » PMID: 27542987

Potential Impact of Minimum Unit Pricing for Alcohol in Ireland: Evidence from the National Alcohol Diary Survey

Overview
Journal Alcohol Alcohol
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2016 Aug 21
PMID 27542987
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: One of the main provisions of the Irish Public Health (Alcohol) Bill is the introduction of a minimum unit price (MUP) for alcohol in Ireland, set at €1.00/standard drink. We sought to identify who will be most affected by the introduction of a MUP, examining the relationship between harmful alcohol consumption, personal income, place of purchase and price paid for alcohol.

Method: A nationally representative survey of 3187 respondents aged 18-75 years, completing a diary of their previous week's alcohol consumption. The primary outcome was purchasing alcohol at <€1.00/standard drink; secondary outcome was purchasing alcohol at <€1.00/standard drink off-sales. Primary exposures were harmful alcohol consumption (AUDIT-C > 5), low personal annual income (<€20,000) and place of purchase (off- or- on-sales).

Results: One in seven respondents (14%) spent <€1.00/standard drink, with a median spend of 0.78/standard drink. High-risk drinkers (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.09-2.23), men (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.43-2.66), people on low income (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.20-2.23) and those purchasing alcohol off-sales (OR 21.9, 95% CI 12.5-38.1) were most likely to report purchasing alcohol at <€1.00/standard drink. Forty-four per cent of alcohol consumed was purchased off-sales. Of those purchasing off-sales, 30% bought cheap alcohol. High-risk drinkers, men and those on low income were most likely to report paying < €1.00/standard drink off-sales.

Conclusion: Heavy drinkers, men and those on low income seek out the cheapest alcohol. The introduction of a MUP in Ireland is likely to target those suffering the greatest harm, and reduce alcohol-attributable mortality in Ireland. Further prospective studies are needed to monitor consumption trends and associated harms following the introduction of minimum unit pricing of alcohol.

Citing Articles

Commentary on Brennan et al.: Pros and cons of minimum unit price for alcohol.

Jiang H, Room R Addiction. 2023; 118(5):834-835.

PMID: 36859757 PMC: 10952525. DOI: 10.1111/add.16165.


Public health policies and alcohol-related liver disease.

Ventura-Cots M, Ballester-Ferre M, Ravi S, Bataller R JHEP Rep. 2020; 1(5):403-413.

PMID: 32039391 PMC: 7005647. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2019.07.009.


Changes in spirits purchasing behaviours after privatisation of government-controlled sales in Washington, USA.

Kerr W, Ye Y, Greenfield T Drug Alcohol Rev. 2019; 38(3):294-301.

PMID: 30860305 PMC: 6415774. DOI: 10.1111/dar.12915.


Spirits purchasing and marijuana use behaviors of risky drinkers in the state of Washington from 2014 to 2016.

Kerr W, Ye Y, Greenfield T Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019; 198:7-12.

PMID: 30856371 PMC: 6467746. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.12.033.


Evidence for the effectiveness of minimum pricing of alcohol: a systematic review and assessment using the Bradford Hill criteria for causality.

Boniface S, Scannell J, Marlow S BMJ Open. 2017; 7(5):e013497.

PMID: 28588106 PMC: 5777460. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013497.