» Articles » PMID: 27540287

Assessment of Satisfaction with Different Dry Powder Inhalation Devices in Greek Patients with COPD and Asthma: the ANASA Study

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2016 Aug 20
PMID 27540287
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Poor adherence to inhaled therapy is common in patients with asthma and COPD. An inhaler selection based on patients' preference could be beneficial to adherence and treatment effectiveness. Properly designed questionnaires can assess patients' satisfaction with their medication devices. The aim of this study was to estimate, using the Feeling of Satisfaction with Inhaler (FSI-10) questionnaire, the ease of use and satisfaction of patients regarding three different marketed dry powder inhalers (DPIs): Diskus(®) (DK), Elpenhaler(®) (EH), and Turbuhaler(®) (TH). The FSI-10 is a self-completed questionnaire to assess patients' opinions regarding ease of use, portability, and usability of devices, irrespective of the drug used.

Patients And Methods: We performed a 4-week, open, noninterventional, multicenter, parallel clinical study in 560 asthmatic and 561 COPD patients. During the first visit, patients were classified into three groups according to the DPI they were already using. Patients were regularly receiving their treatments (Seretide DK, Rolenium EH, and Symbicort TH) and agreed to complete the FSI-10 questionnaire in the second visit.

Results: A total of 517 COPD and 523 asthma patients completed the study. All DPIs tested received satisfactory results, while the EH obtained consistently higher scores in the FSI-10 in both COPD and asthma patients (44.7 and 44.1 vs 41.5 and 43 for TH, 40.8 and 41.4 for DK, P<0.001 and P<0.01, respectively). TH was rated better than DK by asthma patients. Patients suffering with severe COPD tended to express higher feeling of satisfaction than those with moderate or mild disease, irrespective of the device used.

Conclusion: All DPIs tested were highly acceptable by asthma and COPD patients of different ages; nevertheless, EH received significantly higher ratings in most of the questionnaire domains. COPD patients in advanced stages of the disease generally expressed higher level of satisfaction with their devices.

Citing Articles

Recalibrating Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Nebulizers versus Inhalers for Maintenance Therapy in COPD: Past as Prologue.

Dhand R, Hess M, Yohannes A Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024; 19:2571-2586.

PMID: 39629181 PMC: 11612562. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S491275.


Reliability and validity test and application of the Chinese version of the Feeling of Satisfaction with Inhaler.

Meng W, Zhao Z, Xiong R, Zhong Y, Zeng H, Chen Y Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024; 48(12):1854-1864.

PMID: 38448379 PMC: 10930740. DOI: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2023.230289.


Assessment of Inhaler Satisfaction and Determinants of High Satisfaction Among Korean COPD Patients.

Jang J, Lee K, Chung J, Shin K, Choi E, Jin H J Korean Med Sci. 2023; 37(46):e327.

PMID: 36631025 PMC: 9705204. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e327.


Association Between Patient Preference for Inhaler Medications and Asthma Outcomes.

Nakanishi Y, Iwamoto H, Miyamoto S, Nakao S, Higaki N, Yamaguchi K J Asthma Allergy. 2022; 15:1539-1547.

PMID: 36316999 PMC: 9617517. DOI: 10.2147/JAA.S381509.


Shared Decision-Making Facilitates Inhaler Choice in Patients with Newly-Diagnosed Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Multicenter Prospective Study.

Hsiao Y, Tseng C, Sheu C, Wang H, Ko H, Su K Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022; 17:2067-2078.

PMID: 36081765 PMC: 9448347. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S376547.


References
1.
Soulele K, Macheras P, Silvestro L, Rizea Savu S, Karalis V . Population pharmacokinetics of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol using two different dry powder inhalers. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2015; 80:33-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2015.08.009. View

2.
Kozma C, Slaton T, Monz B, Hodder R, Reese P . Development and validation of a patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire for inhalation devices. Treat Respir Med. 2005; 4(1):41-52. DOI: 10.2165/00151829-200504010-00005. View

3.
Ware Jr J, Stewart A . The measurement and meaning of patient satisfaction. Health Med Care Serv Rev. 1977; 1(1):1, 3-15. View

4.
Markson L, Vollmer W, Fitterman L, OConnor E, Narayanan S, Berger M . Insight into patient dissatisfaction with asthma treatment. Arch Intern Med. 2001; 161(3):379-84. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.161.3.379. View

5.
Cerveri I, Locatelli F, Zoia M, Corsico A, Accordini S, De Marco R . International variations in asthma treatment compliance: the results of the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS). Eur Respir J. 1999; 14(2):288-94. DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14b09.x. View