» Articles » PMID: 27536987

Analytical Operations Relate Structural and Functional Connectivity in the Brain

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2016 Aug 19
PMID 27536987
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Resting-state large-scale brain models vary in the amount of biological elements they incorporate and in the way they are being tested. One might expect that the more realistic the model is, the closer it should reproduce real functional data. It has been shown, instead, that when linear correlation across long BOLD fMRI time-series is used as a measure for functional connectivity (FC) to compare simulated and real data, a simple model performs just as well, or even better, than more sophisticated ones. The model in question is a simple linear model, which considers the physiological noise that is pervasively present in our brain while it diffuses across the white-matter connections, that is structural connectivity (SC). We deeply investigate this linear model, providing an analytical solution to straightforwardly compute FC from SC without the need of computationally costly simulations of time-series. We provide a few examples how this analytical solution could be used to perform a fast and detailed parameter exploration or to investigate resting-state non-stationarities. Most importantly, by inverting the analytical solution, we propose a method to retrieve information on the anatomical structure directly from functional data. This simple method can be used to complement or guide DTI/DSI and tractography results, especially for a better assessment of inter-hemispheric connections, or to provide an estimate of SC when only functional data are available.

Citing Articles

Role of homeostatic plasticity in critical brain dynamics following focal stroke lesions.

Rocha R, Zorzi M, Corbetta M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):31631.

PMID: 39738232 PMC: 11685905. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80196-6.


Systematic evaluation of fMRI data-processing pipelines for consistent functional connectomics.

Luppi A, Gellersen H, Liu Z, Peattie A, Manktelow A, Adapa R Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):4745.

PMID: 38834553 PMC: 11150439. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-48781-5.


The Hopf whole-brain model and its linear approximation.

Ponce-Alvarez A, Deco G Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):2615.

PMID: 38297071 PMC: 10831083. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53105-0.


Alzheimer's Disease: Insights from Large-Scale Brain Dynamics Models.

Yang L, Lu J, Li D, Xiang J, Yan T, Sun J Brain Sci. 2023; 13(8).

PMID: 37626490 PMC: 10452161. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13081133.


A Riemannian Revisiting of Structure-Function Mapping Based on Eigenmodes.

Deslauriers-Gauthier S, Zucchelli M, Laghrissi H, Deriche R Front Neuroimaging. 2023; 1:850266.

PMID: 37555180 PMC: 10406294. DOI: 10.3389/fnimg.2022.850266.


References
1.
Deco G, Jirsa V . Ongoing cortical activity at rest: criticality, multistability, and ghost attractors. J Neurosci. 2012; 32(10):3366-75. PMC: 6621046. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2523-11.2012. View

2.
Jirsa V . Neural field dynamics with local and global connectivity and time delay. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2009; 367(1891):1131-43. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0260. View

3.
Roy D, Sigala R, Breakspear M, McIntosh A, Jirsa V, Deco G . Using the virtual brain to reveal the role of oscillations and plasticity in shaping brain's dynamical landscape. Brain Connect. 2014; 4(10):791-811. DOI: 10.1089/brain.2014.0252. View

4.
Barnett L, Buckley C, Bullock S . Neural complexity and structural connectivity. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009; 79(5 Pt 1):051914. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.051914. View

5.
Honey C, Kotter R, Breakspear M, Sporns O . Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(24):10240-5. PMC: 1891224. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0701519104. View