» Articles » PMID: 27532364

Prevalence of ESR1 Mutations in Cell-Free DNA and Outcomes in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the BOLERO-2 Clinical Trial

Overview
Journal JAMA Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2016 Aug 18
PMID 27532364
Citations 238
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Estrogen receptor α (ESR1) mutations found in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) promote ligand-independent receptor activation and resistance to estrogen-deprivation therapy in laboratory models. The prevalence of these mutations and their potential impact on clinical outcomes has not been established.

Objective: To determine the prevalence of ESR1 mutations (Y537S and D538G) in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive MBC and determine whether mutation is associated with inferior outcomes.

Design, Setting, And Participants: From December 16, 2014, to August 26, 2015, we analyzed cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from baseline plasma samples from participants in the BOLERO-2 double-blind phase 3 study that randomized patients from 189 centers in 24 countries with MBC to exemestane plus placebo or exemestane plus everolimus. The study enrolled postmenopausal women with a diagnosis of MBC and prior exposure to an aromatase inhibitor. Baseline plasma samples were available from 541 of 724 patients (74.7%). We assessed the effect of mutation on overall survival of the population and the effect of mutation on progression-free survival (PFS) by treatment arm.

Interventions: Patients were randomized to treatment with exemestane (25 mg oral daily) together with everolimus (10 mg oral daily) or with placebo.

Main Outcomes And Measures: The 2 most frequent mutations in ESR1 (Y537S and D538G) were analyzed from cfDNA using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction and samples scored as wild-type, D538G, Y537S, or double mutant. Cox-proportional hazards model was used to assess PFS in patient subgroups defined by mutations, and the effect of each mutation on overall survival.

Results: Of 541 evaluable patients, 156 (28.8%) had ESR1 mutation D538G (21.1%) and/or Y537S (13.3%), and 30 had both. These mutations were associated with shorter overall survival (wild-type, 32.1 months [95% CI, 28.09-36.40 months]; D538G, 25.99 months [95% CI, 19.19-32.36 months]; Y537S, 19.98 months [13.01-29.31 months]; both mutations, 15.15 months [95% CI, 10.87-27.43 months]). The D538G group (hazard ratio, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.02-0.57]) derived a similar PFS benefit as wild type from addition of everolimus to exemestane.

Conclusions And Relevance: ESR1 mutations are prevalent in ER-positive aromatase inhibitor-treated MBC. Both Y537S and D538G mutations are associated with more aggressive disease biology.

Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00863655.

Citing Articles

The Combined Assessment of CTC and Status in Liquid Biopsy Samples Enhances the Clinical Value of Prediction in Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Szostakowska-Rodzos M, Grzybowska E, Mysliwy I, Zub R, Jagiello-Gruszfeld A, Rubach M Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(5).

PMID: 40076662 PMC: 11900918. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26052038.


Liquid biopsy: Cell-free DNA based analysis in breast cancer.

Venetis K, Cursano G, Pescia C, DErcole M, Porta F, Blanco M J Liq Biopsy. 2025; 1:100002.

PMID: 40027284 PMC: 11863823. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlb.2023.100002.


Dynamics of blood microsatellite instability (bMSI) burden predicts outcome of a patient treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a case report of hyperprogressive disease.

Kravchuk D, Lebedeva A, Kuznetsova O, Kavun A, Taraskina A, Belova E Front Immunol. 2025; 16:1492296.

PMID: 39975556 PMC: 11836019. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1492296.


Breast cancer: pathogenesis and treatments.

Xiong X, Zheng L, Ding Y, Chen Y, Cai Y, Wang L Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2025; 10(1):49.

PMID: 39966355 PMC: 11836418. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-024-02108-4.


Genomic hallmarks of endocrine therapy resistance in ER/PR+HER2- breast tumours.

Ghosh A, Chaubal R, Das C, Parab P, Das S, Maitra A Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):207.

PMID: 39930151 PMC: 11811163. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07606-x.


References
1.
Schiavon G, Hrebien S, Garcia-Murillas I, Cutts R, Pearson A, Tarazona N . Analysis of ESR1 mutation in circulating tumor DNA demonstrates evolution during therapy for metastatic breast cancer. Sci Transl Med. 2015; 7(313):313ra182. PMC: 4998737. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aac7551. View

2.
Wang P, Bahreini A, Gyanchandani R, Lucas P, Hartmaier R, Watters R . Sensitive Detection of Mono- and Polyclonal ESR1 Mutations in Primary Tumors, Metastatic Lesions, and Cell-Free DNA of Breast Cancer Patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2015; 22(5):1130-7. PMC: 4775406. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1534. View

3.
Oxnard G, Paweletz C, Kuang Y, Mach S, OConnell A, Messineo M . Noninvasive detection of response and resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer using quantitative next-generation genotyping of cell-free plasma DNA. Clin Cancer Res. 2014; 20(6):1698-1705. PMC: 3959249. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2482. View

4.
Baselga J, Campone M, Piccart M, Burris 3rd H, Rugo H, Sahmoud T . Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011; 366(6):520-9. PMC: 5705195. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109653. View

5.
Piccart M, Hortobagyi G, Campone M, Pritchard K, Lebrun F, Ito Y . Everolimus plus exemestane for hormone-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative advanced breast cancer: overall survival results from BOLERO-2†. Ann Oncol. 2014; 25(12):2357-2362. PMC: 6267855. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu456. View