» Articles » PMID: 27530745

Safe Introduction of Laparoscopic and Retroperitoneoscopic Nephrectomy in Clinical Practice: Impact of a Modular Training Program

Overview
Journal World J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2016 Aug 18
PMID 27530745
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To describe and validate a novel modular training scheme (MTS) for trans-peritoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN) and retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy (RN).

Methods: Four consultant urologists attended a Masterclass in "Advanced Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery," certified by the University of Turin (IT). The Masterclass was based on a supervised MTS, which involved progressive, proficiency-based training through nine and seven steps for LN and RN, respectively. After becoming proficient in all the steps, each trainee performed a minimum of five procedures as first operator under direct observation of the mentor in the training centre. Then, each trainee independently performed 10 LN and 10 RN at his home institution. The surgical outcomes were compared with those from a contemporary series of procedures performed by the mentor.

Results: All trainees successfully completed the 12-week MTS program. Median number of training cases to become competent in trans-peritoneal LN and RN was 13.0 (IQR 11.5-20.5) and 23.5 (IQR 19.5-32.0), respectively. A significantly higher rate of conversion to open surgery was observed for RNs independently performed by the trainees in their hospital compared to the mentor (p = 0.033). Failure to progress due to difficult anatomical orientation and abdominal wall bleeding during dissection of retroperitoneal space were the most frequent reasons of conversion.

Conclusions: A 12-week intensive modular program allows to achieve proficiency in performing independently LN and a RN after a median of 13 and 23.5 cases, respectively. Therefore, these procedures can be safely introduced and implemented in clinical practice within a relatively short time.

Citing Articles

Is remote live urologic surgery a reality? Evidences from a systematic review of the literature.

Veneziano D, Tafuri A, Gomez Rivas J, Dourado A, Okhunov Z, Somani B World J Urol. 2019; 38(10):2367-2376.

PMID: 31701210 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02996-0.


Embarking with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and dealing with the complications and collateral problems: A single-center experience.

Akdere H, Aktoz T, Arikan M, Atakan I, Veneziano D, Gozen A Turk J Urol. 2019; 46(1):37-43.

PMID: 31657697 PMC: 6944418. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2019.19008.

References
1.
Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S, Dabestani S, Hofmann F, Hora M . EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol. 2015; 67(5):913-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.005. View

2.
Corica F, Boker J, Chou D, White S, Abdelshehid C, Stoliar G . Short-term impact of a laparoscopic "mini-residency" experience on postgraduate urologists' practice patterns. J Am Coll Surg. 2006; 203(5):692-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.027. View

3.
Stolzenburg J, Schwaibold H, Bhanot S, Rabenalt R, Do M, Truss M . Modular surgical training for endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2005; 96(7):1022-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05803.x. View

4.
Brewin J, Ahmed K, Challacombe B . An update and review of simulation in urological training. Int J Surg. 2013; 12(2):103-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.11.012. View

5.
Furriel F, P Laguna M, Figueiredo A, Nunes P, Rassweiler J . Training of European urology residents in laparoscopy: results of a pan-European survey. BJU Int. 2013; 112(8):1223-8. DOI: 10.1111/bju.12410. View