Comparison of Two Synthetic Bone Graft Products in a Rabbit Posterolateral Fusion Model

Overview

Journal Iowa Orthop J

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2016 Aug 17

PMID 27528855

Citations 6

Authors

Douglas Fredericks

Emily B Petersen

Nicole Watson

Nicole Grosland

Katherine Gibson-Corley

Joseph Smucker

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The drawbacks of iliac crest autograft as graft material for spine fusion are well reported. Despite continued modifications to improve bone healing capacity, the efficacy of synthetic graft materials as stand-alone replacements remains uncertain. The rabbit posterolateral fusion model is an established environment for testing of fusion concepts. It offers the opportunity to obtain radiographic, biomechanical and histological data on novel fusion materials. The objective of this study was to compare the spine fusion capability of two synthetic bone graft products in an established rabbit posterolateral spine fusion (PLF) model: Signafuse® Bioactive Bone Graft Putty and Actifuse® ABX.

Methods: Bilateral intertransverse spine fusion was performed at the L5-L6 transverse processes (TPs) of New Zealand White rabbits using either Signafuse or Actifuse ABX as the bone graft material. Bone remodeling and spine fusion were assessed at 6 and 12 weeks using radiographic, biomechanical and histological endpoints.

Results: Fusion rate by manual palpation at 6 weeks was greater for Signafuse (33%) compared to Actifuse ABX (0%), and equivalent in both groups at 12 weeks (50%). Biomechanical fusion rate based on flexion-extension data was 80% in Signafuse group and 44% for Actifuse ABX. Histology revealed a normal healing response in both groups. MicroCT and histomorphometric data at 6 weeks showed greater new bone formation in the Signafuse group compared to Actifuse ABX (p <0.05), with no differences detected at 12 weeks. Histological fusion scores were greater in the Signafuse group at 6 and 12 weeks, indicated by higher degree structural remodeling and tendency towards complete bridging of the fusion bed compared to the Actifuse ABX group.

Conclusion: Confirmed by several metrics, Signafuse outperformed Actifuse ABX as a standalone synthetic bone graft in an established PLF model, demonstrating greater rates of bone remodeling and spine fusion. The combination of 45S5 bioactive glass and biphasic HA/βTCP granules of Signafuse appear to provide greater bone healing capability in comparison to the 0.8% silicate-substituted hydroxyapatite material of Actifuse ABX.

Citing Articles

Developments in Alloplastic Bone Grafts and Barrier Membrane Biomaterials for Periodontal Guided Tissue and Bone Regeneration Therapy.

Ashfaq R, Kovacs A, Berko S, Budai-Szucs M Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(14).

PMID: 39062989 PMC: 11277074. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25147746.

Physico-Chemical Characteristics and Posterolateral Fusion Performance of Biphasic Calcium Phosphate with Submicron Needle-Shaped Surface Topography Combined with a Novel Polymer Binder.

Belluomo R, Arriola-Alvarez I, Kucko N, Walsh W, de Bruijn J, Oliver R Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(4).

PMID: 35207887 PMC: 8880136. DOI: 10.3390/ma15041346.

Effects of systemically administered abaloparatide, an osteoanabolic PTHrP analog, as an adjuvant therapy for spinal fusion in rats.

Arlt H, Besschetnova T, Ominsky M, Fredericks D, Lanske B JOR Spine. 2021; 4(1):e1132.

PMID: 33778406 PMC: 7984001. DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.1132.

Electrospun PLGA and β-TCP (Rebossis-85) in a Lapine Posterolateral Fusion Model.

Nepola J, Petersen E, DeVries-Watson N, Grosland N, Fredericks D Iowa Orthop J. 2020; 39(2):9-19.

PMID: 32577102 PMC: 7047293.

Efficacy of a synthetic calcium phosphate with submicron surface topography as autograft extender in lapine posterolateral spinal fusion.

van Dijk L, Barbieri D, Barrere-de Groot F, Yuan H, Oliver R, Christou C J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019; 107(6):2080-2090.

PMID: 30614621 PMC: 6690075. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34301.

References

Boden S, Schimandle J, Hutton W . An experimental lumbar intertransverse process spinal fusion model. Radiographic, histologic, and biomechanical healing characteristics. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995; 20(4):412-20. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199502001-00003. View

Hu R, Hearn T, Yang J . Bone graft harvest site as a determinant of iliac crest strength. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; (310):252-6. View

Hu R, Bohlman H . Fracture at the iliac bone graft harvest site after fusion of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; (309):208-13. View

Xu R, Ebraheim N, Yeasting R, Jackson W . Anatomic considerations for posterior iliac bone harvesting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21(9):1017-20. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199605010-00004. View

Wheeler D, Jenis L, Kovach M, Marini J, Turner A . Efficacy of silicated calcium phosphate graft in posterolateral lumbar fusion in sheep. Spine J. 2007; 7(3):308-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.01.005. View

Ghodasra J, Daley E, Hsu E, Hsu W . Factors influencing arthrodesis rates in a rabbit posterolateral spine model with iliac crest autograft. Eur Spine J. 2013; 23(2):426-34. PMC: 3906462. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-3074-0. View

Sasso R, Williams J, Dimasi N, Meyer Jr P . Postoperative drains at the donor sites of iliac-crest bone grafts. A prospective, randomized study of morbidity at the donor site in patients who had a traumatic injury of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998; 80(5):631-5. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199805000-00003. View

Smucker J, Petersen E, Nepola J, Fredericks D . Assessment of Mastergraft(®) strip with bone marrow aspirate as a graft extender in a rabbit posterolateral fusion model. Iowa Orthop J. 2013; 32:61-8. PMC: 3565416. View

Erulkar J, Grauer J, Patel T, Panjabi M . Flexibility analysis of posterolateral fusions in a New Zealand white rabbit model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(10):1125-30. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200105150-00006. View

10.

Summers B, Eisenstein S . Donor site pain from the ilium. A complication of lumbar spine fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989; 71(4):677-80. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.71B4.2768321. View

11.

Silber J, Anderson D, Daffner S, Brislin B, Leland J, Hilibrand A . Donor site morbidity after anterior iliac crest bone harvest for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(2):134-9. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200301150-00008. View

12.

Riordan A, Rangarajan R, Balts J, Hsu W, Anderson P . Reliability of the rabbit postero-lateral spinal fusion model: A meta-analysis. J Orthop Res. 2013; 31(8):1261-9. DOI: 10.1002/jor.22359. View

13.

Kahn B . Superior gluteal artery laceration, a complication of iliac bone graft surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979; (140):204-7. View

14.

Ebraheim N, Elgafy H, Xu R . Bone-graft harvesting from iliac and fibular donor sites: techniques and complications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001; 9(3):210-8. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200105000-00007. View

15.

Kurz L, Garfin S, Booth Jr R . Harvesting autogenous iliac bone grafts. A review of complications and techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989; 14(12):1324-31. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198912000-00009. View

16.

Arrington E, Smith W, Chambers H, Bucknell A, Davino N . Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; (329):300-9. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199608000-00037. View

17.

St John T, Vaccaro A, Sah A, Schaefer M, Berta S, Albert T . Physical and monetary costs associated with autogenous bone graft harvesting. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2003; 32(1):18-23. View

18.

Daculsi G, Laboux O, Malard O, Weiss P . Current state of the art of biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramics. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2004; 14(3):195-200. DOI: 10.1023/a:1022842404495. View

19.

Fredericks D, Petersen E, Sahai N, Corley K, DeVries N, Grosland N . Evaluation of a novel silicate substituted hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute in a rabbit posterolateral fusion model. Iowa Orthop J. 2013; 33:25-32. PMC: 3748888. View