» Articles » PMID: 27527751

Comparison of Titanium Elastic Intramedullary Nailing Versus Injection of Bone Marrow in Treatment of Simple Bone Cysts in Children: a Retrospective Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2016 Aug 17
PMID 27527751
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Simple bone cysts are common benign lytic bone lesions in children. The main goals of treatment for bone cysts are to prevent pathological fractures, support the healing process, and prevent recurrence. This retrospective study compared fixation with titanium elastic intramedullary nailing (TEN) versus aspiration and injection of autogenous bone marrow (ABM) for the treatment of simple bone cysts in children.

Methods: Forty-six patients (mean follow-up, 62 months; range, 34-71 months) who presented with bone cysts (30 in the humerus, 16 in the femur) from January 2006 to December 2012 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were treated with either TEN or ABM injection. Radiographs were evaluated according to previously established criteria. Clinical evaluations of pain, infection, additional fractures, and range of motion were performed.

Results: After treatment, all patients were pain-free and had normal range of motion in adjacent joints. In the ABM group, 14 (60.9 %) bone cysts completely healed, six (26.1 %) healed with small residuals after two injections, and three (13.0 %) recurred. In the TEN group, 16 (69.6 %) bone cysts completely healed, four (17.4 %) healed with small residuals, and three (13.0 %) recurred. There were no significant differences in radiographic outcomes between groups at the final follow-up (P > 0.05). Three patients developed skin irritation as a result of the nail ends. Additional fractures occurred in four patients who underwent ABM injection and in two patients who underwent TEN. No significant associations were found between pathological fractures and cyst activity, location, or treatment outcomes in the patients studied.

Conclusions: Both TEN and ABM injection are safe and effective treatment for bone cysts. ABM injection promotes osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells; multiple injections can reduce the likelihood of recurrence. TEN stabilizes the affected bone and thus allows early limb mobilization. It also reduces pressure in the capsule wall by continuous decompression to promote cyst healing. ABM injections can be used to treat cyst recurrence after previous TEN, with favorable results.

Citing Articles

Surgical Treatment of Proximal Humerus Unicameral Bone Cyst: A Case Report.

Nasheed M, Muhammad Abdul Jamil M, Abd Rasid A Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e68435.

PMID: 39360038 PMC: 11445718. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.68435.


Cellular therapies for bone repair: current insights.

Rodham P, Khaliq F, Giannoudis V, Giannoudis P J Orthop Traumatol. 2024; 25(1):28.

PMID: 38789881 PMC: 11132192. DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00768-0.


Long-Term Outcomes of Decompression and Grafting in Acute Pathological Proximal Femur Fractures in Children with Unicameral Bone Cysts: A Retrospective Study Utilizing a 120° Fixed-Angle Low-Contact Locking Pediatric Hip Plate.

Adas M, Cakar M, Demirkale I Med Sci Monit. 2023; 29:e943031.

PMID: 38069463 PMC: 10718052. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943031.


Comparative efficacy and safety profile for the treatment of humeral bone cysts in children: curettage and mixed bone grafting either with or without elastic intramedullary nailing.

Wang X, Han J, Li Y, Liu Y, Luo J J Orthop Surg Res. 2021; 16(1):241.

PMID: 33823909 PMC: 8022413. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-02130-6.


Elastic intramedullary nailing combined with methylprednisolone acetate injection for treatment of unicameral bone cysts in children: a retrospective study.

Zhou J, Ning S, Su Y, Liu C J Child Orthop. 2021; 15(1):55-62.

PMID: 33643459 PMC: 7907766. DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.15.200184.


References
1.
Spinner R, Wang H, Carmichael S, Amrami K, Scheithauer B . Epineurial compartments and their role in intraneural ganglion cyst propagation: an experimental study. Clin Anat. 2007; 20(7):826-33. DOI: 10.1002/ca.20509. View

2.
Glanzmann M, Campos L . Flexible intramedullary nailing for unicameral cysts in children's long bones : Level of evidence: lV, case series. J Child Orthop. 2009; 1(2):97-100. PMC: 2656717. DOI: 10.1007/s11832-007-0018-4. View

3.
Dormans J, Sankar W, Moroz L, Erol B . Percutaneous intramedullary decompression, curettage, and grafting with medical-grade calcium sulfate pellets for unicameral bone cysts in children: a new minimally invasive technique. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005; 25(6):804-11. DOI: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000184647.03981.a5. View

4.
Connolly J . Clinical use of marrow osteoprogenitor cells to stimulate osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (355 Suppl):S257-66. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199810001-00026. View

5.
De Sanctis N, Andreacchio A . Elastic stable intramedullary nailing is the best treatment of unicameral bone cysts of the long bones in children?: Prospective long-term follow-up study. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006; 26(4):520-5. DOI: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000217729.39288.df. View