» Articles » PMID: 2752708

Mechanisms That Improve Referential Access

Overview
Journal Cognition
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychology
Date 1989 Jul 1
PMID 2752708
Citations 72
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two mechanisms, suppression and enhancement, are proposed to improve referential access. Enhancement improves the accessibility of previously mentioned concepts by increasing or boosting their activation; suppression improves concepts' accessibility by decreasing or dampening the activation of other concepts. Presumably, these mechanisms are triggered by the informational content of anaphors. Six experiments investigated this proposal by manipulating whether an anaphoric reference was made with a very explicit, repeated name anaphor or a less explicit pronoun. Subjects read sentences that introduced two participants in their first clauses, for example, "Ann predicted that Pam would lose the track race," and the sentences referred to one of the two participants in their second clauses, "but Pam/she came in first very easily." While subjects read each sentence, the activation level of the two participants was measured by a probe verification task. The first two experiments demonstrated that explicit, repeated name anaphors immediately trigger the enhancement of their own antecedents and immediately trigger the suppression of other (nonantecedent) participants. The third experiment demonstrated that less explicit, pronoun anaphors also trigger the suppression of other nonantecedents, but they do so less quickly--even when, as in the fourth experiment, the semantic information to identify their antecedents occurs prior to the pronouns (e.g., "Ann predicted that Pam would lose the track race. But after winning the race, she..."). The fifth experiment demonstrated that more explicit pronouns--pronouns that match the gender of only one participant-trigger suppression more powerfully. A final experiment demonstrated that it is not only rementioned participants who improve their referential access by triggering the suppression of other participants; newly introduced participants do so too (e.g., "Ann predicted that Pam would lose the track race, but Kim..."). Thus, both suppression and enhancement improve referential access, and the contribution of these two mechanisms is a function of explicitness. The role of these two mechanisms in mediating other referential access phenomena is also discussed.

Citing Articles

Age-related differences in memory encoding and retrieval during referential processing: A time-frequency analysis.

Karimi H, Boudewyn M, Vandenheever D, Diaz M Psychol Aging. 2024; 39(7):731-749.

PMID: 39495563 PMC: 11537493. DOI: 10.1037/pag0000857.


Asymmetries in encoding event roles: Evidence from language and cognition.

Unal E, Wilson F, Trueswell J, Papafragou A Cognition. 2024; 250:105868.

PMID: 38959638 PMC: 11358469. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105868.


Sheer Time Spent Expecting or Maintaining a Representation Facilitates Subsequent Retrieval during Sentence Processing.

Karimi H, Diaz M, Wittenberg E Cogsci. 2023; 2020:2728-2734.

PMID: 37265777 PMC: 10234091.


How do Antecedent Semantics Influence Pronoun Interpretation? Evidence from Eye Movements.

Simovic T, Chambers C Cogn Sci. 2023; 47(2):e13251.

PMID: 36745513 PMC: 10077901. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.13251.


The effects of semantic similarity on Mandarin speakers' referential expressions.

Zhou Y, Branigan H, Yu Y, Pickering M Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023; 76(11):2579-2595.

PMID: 36655936 PMC: 10585944. DOI: 10.1177/17470218231154578.


References
1.
Kintsch W . The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. Psychol Rev. 1988; 95(2):163-82. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.163. View

2.
Von Eckardt B, Potter M . Clauses and the semantic representation of words. Mem Cognit. 1985; 13(4):371-6. DOI: 10.3758/bf03202505. View

3.
Rumelhart D, McClelland J . An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychol Rev. 1982; 89(1):60-94. View

4.
Gernsbacher M . Surface Information Loss in Comprehension. Cogn Psychol. 2014; 17(3):324-363. PMC: 4191867. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(85)90012-X. View

5.
Murphy G . Establishing and accessing referents in discourse. Mem Cognit. 1984; 12(5):489-97. DOI: 10.3758/bf03198311. View