» Articles » PMID: 27522607

Grassland Structural Heterogeneity in a Savanna is Driven More by Productivity Differences Than by Consumption Differences Between Lawn and Bunch Grasses

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2016 Aug 15
PMID 27522607
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Savanna grasslands are characterized by high spatial heterogeneity in vegetation structure, aboveground biomass and nutritional quality, with high quality short-grass grazing lawns forming mosaics with patches of tall bunch grasses of lower quality. This heterogeneity can arise because of local differences in consumption, because of differences in productivity, or because both processes enforce each other (more production and consumption). However, the relative importance of both processes in maintaining mosaics of lawn and bunch grassland types has not been measured. Also their interplay been not been assessed across landscape gradients. In a South African savanna, we, therefore, measured the seasonal changes in primary production, nutritional quality and herbivore consumption (amount and percentage) of grazing lawns and adjacent bunch grass patches across a rainfall gradient. We found both higher amounts of primary production and, to a smaller extent, consumption for bunch grass patches. In addition, for bunch grasses primary production increased towards higher rainfall while foliar nitrogen concentrations decreased. Foliar nitrogen concentrations of lawn grasses decreased much less with increasing rainfall. Consequently, large herbivores targeted the biomass produced on grazing lawns with on average 75 % of the produced biomass consumed. We conclude that heterogeneity in vegetation structure in this savanna ecosystem is better explained by small-scale differences in productivity between lawn and bunch grass vegetation types than by local differences in consumption rates. Nevertheless, the high nutritional quality of grazing lawns is highly attractive and, therefore, important for the maintenance of the heterogeneity in species composition (i.e. grazing lawn maintenance).

Citing Articles

Density-dependent plant growth drives grazer stimulation of aboveground net primary production in Yellowstone grasslands.

Penner J, Frank D Oecologia. 2021; 196(3):851-861.

PMID: 34117517 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-021-04960-5.


Tracking nutrients in space and time: Interactions between grazing lawns and drought drive abundances of tallgrass prairie grasshoppers.

Ozment K, Welti E, Shaffer M, Kaspari M Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(10):5413-5423.

PMID: 34026017 PMC: 8131794. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7435.


Coming undone: hemiparasite presence and effects in a prairie grassland diminish over time.

Borowicz V, Walder M, Armstrong J Oecologia. 2019; 190(3):679-688.

PMID: 31250186 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-019-04443-8.

References
1.
Olff H, Ritchie M, Prins H . Global environmental controls of diversity in large herbivores. Nature. 2002; 415(6874):901-4. DOI: 10.1038/415901a. View

2.
Cromsigt J, Olff H . Resource partitioning among savanna grazers mediated by local heterogeneity: an experimental approach. Ecology. 2006; 87(6):1532-41. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1532:rpasgm]2.0.co;2. View

3.
Breman H, de Wit C . Rangeland productivity and exploitation in the sahel. Science. 1983; 221(4618):1341-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.221.4618.1341. View

4.
McNAUGHTON S . Serengeti migratory wildebeest: facilitation of energy flow by grazing. Science. 1976; 191(4222):92-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.191.4222.92. View

5.
Farnsworth K, Focardi S, Beecham J . Grassland-herbivore interactions: how do grazers coexist?. Am Nat. 2008; 159(1):24-39. DOI: 10.1086/324114. View