» Articles » PMID: 27522216

Evidence on Adrenaline Use in Resuscitation and Its Relevance to Newborn Infants: A Non-Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Neonatology
Publisher Karger
Date 2016 Aug 15
PMID 27522216
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: Guidelines for newborn resuscitation state that if the heart rate does not increase despite adequate ventilation and chest compressions, adrenaline administration should be considered. However, controversy exists around the safety and effectiveness of adrenaline in newborn resuscitation. The aim of this review was to summarise a selection of the current knowledge about adrenaline during resuscitation and evaluate its relevance to newborn infants.

Methods: A search in PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar until September 1, 2015, using search terms including adrenaline/epinephrine, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, death, severe brain injury, necrotizing enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and adrenaline versus vasopressin/placebo.

Results: Adult data indicate that adrenaline improves the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) but not survival to hospital discharge. Newborn animal studies reported that adrenaline might be needed to achieve ROSC. Intravenous administration (10-30 μg/kg) is recommended; however, if there is no intravenous access, a higher endotracheal dose (50-100 μg/kg) is needed. The safety and effectiveness of intraosseous adrenaline remain undetermined. Early and frequent dosing does not seem to be beneficial. In fact, negative hemodynamic effects have been observed, especially with doses ≥30 μg/kg intravenously. Little is known about adrenaline in birth asphyxia and in preterm infants, but observations indicate that hemodynamics and neurological outcomes may be impaired by adrenaline administration in these conditions. However, a causal relationship between adrenaline administration and outcomes cannot be established from the few available retrospective studies. Alternative vasoconstrictors have been investigated, but the evidence is scarce.

Conclusion: More research is needed on the benefits and risks of adrenaline in asphyxia-induced bradycardia or cardiac arrest during perinatal transition.

Citing Articles

Effect of vasopressin on brain and cardiac tissue during neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated post-transitional piglets.

Chaudhry A, OReilly M, Ramsie M, Lee T, Cheung P, Schmolzer G Resusc Plus. 2025; 21:100837.

PMID: 39758757 PMC: 11699340. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100837.


Neonatal resuscitation with vasopressin instead of epinephrine: are we ready to challenge the status quo?.

Foth A, Stewart D, Tingay D Pediatr Res. 2023; 95(5):1174-1176.

PMID: 38071278 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-023-02961-z.


Comparison of various vasopressin doses to epinephrine during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in asphyxiated neonatal piglets.

Ramsie M, Cheung P, Lee T, OReilly M, Schmolzer G Pediatr Res. 2023; 95(5):1265-1272.

PMID: 37940664 PMC: 11035119. DOI: 10.1038/s41390-023-02858-x.


Vasopressin versus epinephrine during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated newborns: A study protocol for a prospective, cluster, open label, single-center, randomized controlled phase 2 trial - The VERSE-Trial.

Ramsie M, Cheung P, Law B, Schmolzer G Resusc Plus. 2023; 16:100459.

PMID: 37663146 PMC: 10474318. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100459.


Vasopressin versus epinephrine during neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated post-transitional piglets.

OReilly M, Lee T, Cheung P, Schmolzer G Resusc Plus. 2023; 15:100427.

PMID: 37519409 PMC: 10372457. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100427.