» Articles » PMID: 27519683

A Tabu-Search Heuristic for Deterministic Two-Mode Blockmodeling of Binary Network Matrices

Overview
Journal Psychometrika
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2016 Aug 14
PMID 27519683
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two-mode binary data matrices arise in a variety of social network contexts, such as the attendance or non-attendance of individuals at events, the participation or lack of participation of groups in projects, and the votes of judges on cases. A popular method for analyzing such data is two-mode blockmodeling based on structural equivalence, where the goal is to identify partitions for the row and column objects such that the clusters of the row and column objects form blocks that are either complete (all 1s) or null (all 0s) to the greatest extent possible. Multiple restarts of an object relocation heuristic that seeks to minimize the number of inconsistencies (i.e., 1s in null blocks and 0s in complete blocks) with ideal block structure is the predominant approach for tackling this problem. As an alternative, we propose a fast and effective implementation of tabu search. Computational comparisons across a set of 48 large network matrices revealed that the new tabu-search heuristic always provided objective function values that were better than those of the relocation heuristic when the two methods were constrained to the same amount of computation time.

Citing Articles

Detecting Clusters/Communities in Social Networks.

Hoffman M, Steinley D, Gates K, Prinstein M, Brusco M Multivariate Behav Res. 2017; 53(1):57-73.

PMID: 29220584 PMC: 6103523. DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2017.1391682.


A method for making inferences in network analysis: Comment on Forbes, Wright, Markon, and Krueger (2017).

Steinley D, Hoffman M, Brusco M, Sher K J Abnorm Psychol. 2017; 126(7):1000-1010.

PMID: 29106283 PMC: 5982585. DOI: 10.1037/abn0000308.


Multiobjective blockmodeling for social network analysis.

Brusco M, Doreian P, Steinley D, Satornino C Psychometrika. 2014; 78(3):498-525.

PMID: 25106397 DOI: 10.1007/s11336-012-9313-1.

References
1.
van Uitert M, Meuleman W, Wessels L . Biclustering sparse binary genomic data. J Comput Biol. 2008; 15(10):1329-45. DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2008.0066. View

2.
Vermunt J . K-means may perform as well as mixture model clustering but may also be much worse: comment on Steinley and Brusco (2011). Psychol Methods. 2011; 16(1):82-8. DOI: 10.1037/a0020144. View

3.
Brusco M, Steinley D . K-balance partitioning: an exact method with applications to generalized structural balance and other psychological contexts. Psychol Methods. 2010; 15(2):145-57. DOI: 10.1037/a0017738. View

4.
McLachlan G . Commentary on Steinley and Brusco (2011): recommendations and cautions. Psychol Methods. 2011; 16(1):80-1. DOI: 10.1037/a0021141. View

5.
Airoldi E, Blei D, Fienberg S, Xing E . Mixed Membership Stochastic Blockmodels. J Mach Learn Res. 2011; 9:1981-2014. PMC: 3119541. View