» Articles » PMID: 27515487

Clinical and Perceived Quality of Care for Maternal, Neonatal and Antenatal Care in Kenya and Namibia: the Service Provision Assessment

Overview
Journal Reprod Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2016 Aug 13
PMID 27515487
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The majority of women in sub-Saharan Africa now deliver in a facility, however, little is known about the quality of services for maternal and newborn basic and emergency care, nor how this is associated with patient's perception of their experiences.

Methods: Using data from the Service Provision Assessment (SPA) survey from Kenya 2010 and Namibia 2009, we explore whether facilities have the necessary signal functions for providing emergency and basic maternal (EmOC) and newborn care (EmNC), and antenatal care (ANC) using descriptives and multivariate regression. We explore differences by type of facility (hospital, center or other) and by private and public facilities. Finally, we see if patient satisfaction (taken from exit surveys at antenatal care) is associated with the quality of services (specific services provided).

Results: We find that most facilities do not have all of the signal functions, with 46 and 27 % in Kenya and 18 and 5 % in Namibia of facilities have high/basic scores in routine and emergency obstetric care, respectively. We found that hospitals preform better than centers in general and few differences emerged between public and private facilities. Patient perceptions were not consistently associated with services provided; however, patients had fewer complaints in private compared to public facilities in Kenya (-0.46 fewer complaints in private) and smaller facilities compared to larger in Namibia (-0.26 fewer complaints in smaller facilities). Service quality itself (measured in scores), however, was only significantly better in Kenya for EmOC and EmNC.

Conclusions: This analysis sheds light on the inadequate levels of care for saving maternal and newborn lives in most facilities in two countries of Africa. It also highlights the disconnect between patients' perceptions and clinical quality of services. More effort is needed to ensure that high quality supply of services is present to meet growing demand as an increasing number of women deliver in facilities.

Citing Articles

Private sector quality of care for maternal, new-born, and child health in low-and-middle-income countries: a secondary review.

Morris G, Maliqi B, Lattof S, Strong J, Yaqub N Front Glob Womens Health. 2024; 5:1369792.

PMID: 38707636 PMC: 11066217. DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1369792.


An investigation of factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care services among women in post-natal wards in two Namibian hospitals in the Khomas region.

Amungulu M, Nghitanwa E, Mbapaha C J Public Health Afr. 2023; 14(3):2154.

PMID: 37197265 PMC: 10184171. DOI: 10.4081/jphia.2023.2154.


Patient reported experience measures on HIV viral load testing at public health facilities in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: A convergent mixed method study.

Karoli P, Shayo G, Shayo E, Wood C, Ottaru T, Hawkins C PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 3(4):e0001024.

PMID: 37027354 PMC: 10081772. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001024.


Determinants of childbirth care quality along the care continuum in limited resource settings: A structural equation modeling analysis of cross-sectional data from Burkina Faso and Côte d'Ivoire.

Millogo T, Kourouma R, Meda B, Agbre-Yace M, Dosso A, Yameogo M BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021; 21(1):848.

PMID: 34965869 PMC: 8715591. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04328-w.


Experiences of private sector quality care amongst mothers, newborns, and children in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Strong J, Lattof S, Maliqi B, Yaqub N BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 21(1):1311.

PMID: 34872542 PMC: 8647361. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06905-3.


References
1.
Myer L, Harrison A . Why do women seek antenatal care late? Perspectives from rural South Africa. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2003; 48(4):268-72. DOI: 10.1016/s1526-9523(02)00421-x. View

2.
Hodgins S, DAgostino A . The quality-coverage gap in antenatal care: toward better measurement of effective coverage. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014; 2(2):173-81. PMC: 4168625. DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00176. View

3.
Abuya T, Warren C, Miller N, Njuki R, Ndwiga C, Maranga A . Exploring the prevalence of disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Kenya. PLoS One. 2015; 10(4):e0123606. PMC: 4401776. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123606. View

4.
Blanc A, Warren C, McCarthy K, Kimani J, Ndwiga C, Ramarao S . Assessing the validity of indicators of the quality of maternal and newborn health care in Kenya. J Glob Health. 2016; 6(1):010405. PMC: 4871064. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.06.010405. View

5.
Kruk M, Paczkowski M, Mbaruku G, Pinho H, Galea S . Women's preferences for place of delivery in rural Tanzania: a population-based discrete choice experiment. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99(9):1666-72. PMC: 2724466. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.146209. View