» Articles » PMID: 27512881

Defining and Validating Comorbidities and Procedures in ICD-10 Health Data in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2016 Aug 12
PMID 27512881
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Administrative health databases are used in research to define comorbid conditions, diagnosis, and procedures. Our objectives were to validate a diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and invasive cardiac procedure coding against a comprehensive registry of STEMI patients and determine an optimal algorithm for defining comorbidities using administrative hospitalization and ambulatory databases, but without using a physician claims database, which is unavailable for use in many jurisdictions.A registry of consecutive STEMI patients was used to define a reference cohort and linked to the hospitalization and ambulatory databases. Four administrative case definitions for defining comorbidities, as well as STEMI diagnosis and in-hospital procedures using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) and the Canadian Classification of Health Interventions (CCI) were evaluated. Metrics were used to evaluate algorithm performance and compare discriminative ability using the C statistic.The 3236 patients had median age of 60 years (interquartile range 52-71) and 75.7% were male. A diagnosis of STEMI was correctly identified in the administrative records for 3043 (94.0%) patients. In-hospital procedures (coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary intervention, and angiogram) were well identified using administrative definitions (Kappa statistic 0.83-1.00). Validation of comorbidities varied by condition but an algorithm using 2 inpatient/ambulatory visits in the previous 2 years maximized PPV, ranging from 28.6% for previous heart failure to 95.7% for previous MI. The c statistic was similar for each of the methods, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80.ICD-10 and CCI codes can identify hospitalized STEMI patients with high sensitivity and accurately define in-hospital cardiac procedures. Comorbidities can be defined with high PPV using a definition of 2 inpatient/ambulatory visits in the previous 2 years.

Citing Articles

Comparative analysis of cardiogenic shock outcomes in acute myocardial infarction with polyvascular disease.

Gatuz M, Abu-Fanne R, Abramov D, Barel M, Mamas M, Roguin A Am Heart J Plus. 2024; 46:100452.

PMID: 39319104 PMC: 11419879. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100452.


Validity of Routine Health Data To Identify Safety Outcomes of Interest For Covid-19 Vaccines and Therapeutics in the Context of the Emerging Pandemic: A Comprehensive Literature Review.

Andresen K, Hinojosa-Campos M, Podmore B, Drysdale M, Qizilbash N, Cunnington M Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2024; 16:1-17.

PMID: 38192299 PMC: 10771726. DOI: 10.2147/DHPS.S415292.


Initial treatment of uninsured patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction by facility percutaneous coronary intervention capabilities.

Lin S, Shermeyer A, Nikpay S, Hsia R, Ward M Acad Emerg Med. 2023; 31(2):119-128.

PMID: 37921055 PMC: 11025473. DOI: 10.1111/acem.14831.


Interfacility Transfer of Uninsured vs Insured Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in California.

Ward M, Nikpay S, Shermeyer A, Nallamothu B, Rokos I, Self W JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(6):e2317831.

PMID: 37294567 PMC: 10257096. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17831.


Impact of Gender, Race, and Insurance Status on Inhospital Management and Outcomes in Patients With COVID-19 and ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (a Nationwide Analysis).

Patel K, Majmundar M, Vasudeva R, Doshi R, Kaur A, Mehta H Am J Cardiol. 2023; 198:14-25.

PMID: 37196529 PMC: 10184571. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.04.030.


References
1.
Quan H, Khan N, Hemmelgarn B, Tu K, Chen G, Campbell N . Validation of a case definition to define hypertension using administrative data. Hypertension. 2009; 54(6):1423-8. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.139279. View

2.
Humphries K, Rankin J, Carere R, Buller C, Kiely F, Spinelli J . Co-morbidity data in outcomes research: are clinical data derived from administrative databases a reliable alternative to chart review?. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000; 53(4):343-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00188-2. View

3.
Henderson T, Shepheard J, Sundararajan V . Quality of diagnosis and procedure coding in ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2006; 44(11):1011-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000228018.48783.34. View

4.
Kasanuki H, Honda T, Haze K, Sumiyoshi T, Horie T, Yagi M . A large-scale prospective cohort study on the current status of therapeutic modalities for acute myocardial infarction in Japan: rationale and initial results of the HIJAMI Registry. Am Heart J. 2005; 150(3):411-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.10.001. View

5.
Quan H, Li B, Saunders L, Parsons G, Nilsson C, Alibhai A . Assessing validity of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data in recording clinical conditions in a unique dually coded database. Health Serv Res. 2008; 43(4):1424-41. PMC: 2517283. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00822.x. View