» Articles » PMID: 27509952

Expression of the P16 and Ki67 in Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions and Cancer

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2016 Aug 12
PMID 27509952
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the expression of p16 and Ki67 in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cancer.

Materials And Methods: We performed a immunohistochemical study of p16 and Ki67 in 243 cervical tissues 53 nondysplastic lesions, 106 CIN1, 61 CIN2/3 and 23 squamous cell carcinomas. The expression of p16 and Ki67 was interpreted independently by 2 researchers and the sensitivity and specificity to detect clinically significant lesions (≥ CIN2) were determined.

Results: The overall agreement results of positive or negative immunostaining of intrainter observer variability were 0.659 for p16 and 0.808 for Ki67. p16 expression was demonstrated in 91.3% of invasive carcinomas, 78.7% of CIN2/3, 10.4% of CIN1 and 9.4% of nondysplasic lesions. The corresponding Ki67 expression was: 100% of all invasive carcinomas, 75.4% of CIN2/3, 22.6% of CIN1, and 11.3% with nondysplasia. The expression was significantly different between CIN2/3 vs CIN1 for both p16 and Ki67 (pvalues <0.001 both), and cancer vs CIN2/3 for Ki67 (pvalue 0.008). The differences were not significant between CIN1 vs nondysplasia (pvalues 1.000 for p16 and 0.130 of Ki67), and cancer vs CIN2/3 for p16 (p value 0.219). The sensitivity and specificity to detect > CIN2 were 84.5% and 90.5% by p16 and 82.1% and 88.6% by Ki67.

Conclusions: The rates for 16 and Ki67 expression were directly associated with the severity of cervical lesions. Significant differences in these markers expression may be useful in cases with equivocal histologic features among cervical intraepithelial lesions, but not between CIN1 and nondysplastic lesions. The two markers had high sensitivity and specificity in determining >CIN2.

Citing Articles

Pathological Changes and Pregnancy Outcomes in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Patients After Cold Knife Conization.

Cui N, Li X, Wen X, Xu J, Chen L Int J Gen Med. 2024; 17:3641-3648.

PMID: 39189006 PMC: 11346493. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S457614.


Association between serum P16ink4A concentration and CIN and cervical cancer among women attending a cervical cancer clinic in western Uganda: A case control study.

Ssedyabane F, Ngonzi J, Tusubira D, Nambi Najjuma J, Kajabwangu R, Okeny C Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2024; 53:101388.

PMID: 38590932 PMC: 10999470. DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101388.


Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia grade 2 biopsy: Do p16INK4a and Ki-67 biomarkers contribute to the decision to treat? A cross-sectional study.

Ferreira A, Dibe N, Paiva B, Portari E, Dock D, Ferreira N Sao Paulo Med J. 2023; 142(1):e2022527.

PMID: 37646766 PMC: 10452003. DOI: 10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0527.R2.280423.


CIN grades possessing different HPV RNA location patterns and RNAscope is helpful tool for distinguishing squamous intraepithelial lesions in difficult cervical cases.

Chen R, Zhang R, Zhang M, Liu S, Xie M, Yang Z Diagn Pathol. 2023; 18(1):23.

PMID: 36797728 PMC: 9933306. DOI: 10.1186/s13000-023-01308-w.


Comparison of Ki67 index and P16 expression in different grades of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Hosseini M, Talayeh M, Moghaddam N, Arab M, Farzaneh F, Ashrafganjoei T Caspian J Intern Med. 2023; 14(1):69-75.

PMID: 36741489 PMC: 9878899. DOI: 10.22088/cjim.14.1.69.