Effect of Bonding Application Time on Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Glass Ionomer Cement

Overview

Journal J Dent (Tehran)

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2016 Aug 11

PMID 27507998

Citations 6

Authors

Narges Panahandeh

Hassan Torabzadeh

Amir Ghassemi

Mina Mahdian

Alireza Akbarzadeh Bagheban

Seddigheh Moayyedi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: This experimental study evaluated the effect of bonding application time on the microshear bond strength of composite resin to different types of glass ionomer cements (GICs).

Materials And Methods: One-hundred and sixty specimens (two conventional and two resin-modified GICs) were prepared and divided into 16 groups. The surface of all specimens was prepared using two different bonding systems (Frog and Stea) at three different times. After setting, the composite resin (Z100) was placed over the GICs. The specimens were then stored in distilled water for 24 hours (37°C) and exposed to microshear stresses at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The results were analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (P<0.05).

Results: In conventional GICs, bond strength was affected by the type of bonding system at different times, and bond strength was significantly higher in the Fuji II group compared to Riva Self Cure group. In the Riva Self Cure group, bond strength was significantly affected by time; whereas, the type of bonding system failed to exert a significant effect on bond strength. There was no significant correlation between the type of bonding system and the two brands of resin-modified GICs. Bond strength was not affected by the type of bonding agent; however, among the two brands of resin-modified GICs, Fuji II LC yielded a significantly stronger bond.

Conclusion: It appears that the type of bonding agent does not affect the microshear bond strength, and the bonding application time affects the microshear bond strength in Riva Self Cure GICs.

Citing Articles

Immediate and delayed micro shear bond strength evaluation of two glass ionomer cements to composite resin by using different bonding techniques-an in vitro study.

Saleh S, Hassan N, Algarni A, Zahran R, Farag A, Hashem D BDJ Open. 2024; 10(1):94.

PMID: 39690205 PMC: 11652667. DOI: 10.1038/s41405-024-00283-8.

Shear bond strength between conventional composite resin and alkasite-based restoration used in sandwich technique: An study.

Dawood A, Alkhalidi E, Saeed M J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2024; 14(2):161-166.

PMID: 38827354 PMC: 11141895. DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_4_24.

Adhesion and Surface Roughness of Apatite-Containing Carbomer and Improved Ionically Bioactive Resin Compared to Glass Ionomers.

Isik H, Cilingir A J Funct Biomater. 2023; 14(7).

PMID: 37504862 PMC: 10381571. DOI: 10.3390/jfb14070367.

A Comparison of Laser and Mechanical Surface Pretreatment Methods on Shear Bond Strength of Resin Composite to Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer.

Zakavi F, Gholizadeh S, Dibazar S, Esmaeili M J Dent (Shiraz). 2023; 24(1 Suppl):103-111.

PMID: 37051498 PMC: 10084561. DOI: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.92281.1624.

Effect of total-etch and self-etch adhesives on the bond strength of composite to glass-ionomer cement/resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in the sandwich technique - A systematic review.

Manihani A, Mulay S, Beri L, Shetty R, Gulati S, Dalsania R Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021; 18:72.

PMID: 34760063 PMC: 8543098. DOI: 10.4103/1735-3327.326645.

References

Zhang Y, Burrow M, Palamara J, Thomas C . Bonding to glass ionomer cements using resin-based adhesives. Oper Dent. 2011; 36(6):618-25. DOI: 10.2341/10-140-L. View

Navimipour E, Savadi Oskoee S, Alizadeh Oskoee P, Bahari M, Rikhtegaran S, Ghojazadeh M . Effect of acid and laser etching on shear bond strength of conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements to composite resin. Lasers Med Sci. 2011; 27(2):305-11. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-010-0868-8. View

Burrow M . Understanding adhesive dentistry. Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg. 2011; 20:75-9. View

Aboush Y, Torabzadeh H . Fluoride release from tooth-colored restorative materials: a 12-month report. J Can Dent Assoc. 1998; 64(8):561-4, 568. View

Chin Y, Tyas M . Adhesion of composite resin to etched glass ionomer cement. Aust Dent J. 1988; 33(2):87-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1988.tb00646.x. View

McLean J, Powis D, Prosser H, Wilson A . The use of glass-ionomer cements in bonding composite resins to dentine. Br Dent J. 1985; 158(11):410-4. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4805621. View

Ghasemi A, Torabzadeh H, Mahdian M, Afkar M, Fazeli A, Akbarzadeh Baghban A . Effect of bonding application time on the microleakage of Class V sandwich restorations. Aust Dent J. 2012; 57(3):334-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01712.x. View

Welbury R, McCabe J, Murray J, Rusby S . Factors affecting the bond strength of composite resin to etched glass-ionomer cement. J Dent. 1988; 16(4):188-93. DOI: 10.1016/0300-5712(88)90036-x. View

Lund R, Da Silva A, Demarco F, Del-Pino F, Piva E, Michelon D . Band cementation materials: solubility and fluoride release. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2009; 6(4):323-9. View

10.

Fritz U, Finger W, Uno S . Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: bonding to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater. 1996; 12(3):161-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(96)80015-7. View

11.

Nakanuma K, Hayakawa T, Tomita T, Yamazaki M . Effect of the application of dentin primers and a dentin bonding agent on the adhesion between the resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and dentin. Dent Mater. 1999; 14(4):281-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(98)00040-2. View

12.

Taggart S, Pearson G . The effect of etching on glass polyalkenoate cements. J Oral Rehabil. 1991; 18(1):31-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1991.tb00027.x. View

13.

Kerby R, Knobloch L . The relative shear bond strength of visible light-curing and chemically curing glass-ionomer cement to composite resin. Quintessence Int. 1992; 23(9):641-4. View

14.

Oilo G . Early erosion of dental cements. Scand J Dent Res. 1984; 92(6):539-43. View

15.

Gemalmaz D, Yoruc B, Ozcan M, Alkumru H . Effect of early water contact on solubility of glass ionomer luting cements. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 80(4):474-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70014-9. View

16.

Hamouda I . Effects of various beverages on hardness, roughness, and solubility of esthetic restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011; 23(5):315-22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00453.x. View

17.

Mount G . The tensile strength of the union between various glass ionomer cements and various composite resins. Aust Dent J. 1989; 34(2):136-46. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1989.tb04623.x. View

18.

Aboush Y, Torabzadeh H . Clinical performance of Class II restorations in which resin composite is laminated over resin-modified glass-ionomer. Oper Dent. 2001; 25(5):367-73. View

19.

Van Landuyt K, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B . Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior acid-etching. J Dent. 2005; 34(1):77-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.04.001. View

20.

Mount G . Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Glass-ionomer cements: past, present and future. Oper Dent. 1994; 19(3):82-90. View