» Articles » PMID: 27505407

Attentional Bias Temporal Dynamics in Remitted Depression

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2016 Aug 10
PMID 27505407
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Theory implicates attentional bias (AB) or dysregulated attentional processing of emotional information in the recurrence of major depressive episodes. However, empirical study of AB among remitted depressed patients is limited in scope and has yielded mixed findings. Mixed findings may be accounted for by how the field has conceptualized and thereby studied AB. We propose that a novel temporal dynamic process perspective on AB may help disambiguate extant findings and elucidate the nature of AB in remitted depression. Thus, we reexamined Dot Probe data among remitted depressed patients (RMD; n = 328) and nondepressed controls (NDC; n = 82) that previously yielded null effects when AB was quantified by means of the traditional aggregated mean bias score (Vrijsen et al., 2014). We reanalyzed data using a novel computational approach that extracts a series of bias estimations from trial to trial (Zvielli, Bernstein, & Koster, 2015). Key features of these dynamic process signals revealed moderate to excellent reliability relative to the traditional aggregated mean bias scores. These features of AB dynamics-specifically temporal variability in AB including AB toward and away from emotional stimuli-were significantly elevated among RMDs relative to NDCs. Moreover, among RMDs, a greater number of past depressive episodes were associated with elevation in these features of AB dynamics. Effects were not accounted for by residual depressive symptoms or social anxiety symptoms. Findings indicate that dysregulation in attentional processing of emotional information reflected in AB dynamics may be key to depression vulnerability. (PsycINFO Database Record

Citing Articles

Preference for digital media use, biobehavioral attention bias, and anxiety symptoms in adolescents.

Myruski S, de Rutte J, Findley A, Roy A, Dennis-Tiwary T Comput Hum Behav Rep. 2024; 15.

PMID: 39268514 PMC: 11391916. DOI: 10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100439.


Individual differences in emotion-induced blindness: Are they reliable and what do they measure?.

Edwards M, Denniston D, Bariesheff C, Wyche N, Goodhew S Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 86(5):1-15.

PMID: 38760639 PMC: 11557664. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02900-y.


Estradiol effects on an emotional interference task in adolescents with current and remitted depression.

Sullivan A, Chung Y, Novotny S, Epperson C, Kober H, Blumberg H Horm Behav. 2023; 157:105450.

PMID: 37923628 PMC: 10842169. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2023.105450.


Reliability of attention bias and attention bias variability to climate change images in the dot-probe task.

Carlson J, Fang L, Coughtry-Carpenter C, Foley J Front Psychol. 2023; 13:1021858.

PMID: 36710831 PMC: 9878553. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1021858.


The questionable validity of attention bias variability: Evidence from two conceptually unrelated cognitive tasks.

Carlson J, Fang L, Kassel D J Affect Disord Rep. 2023; 10.

PMID: 36684713 PMC: 9851093. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadr.2022.100411.