» Articles » PMID: 27504476

Intra-individual Diagnostic Image Quality and Organ-specific-radiation Dose Comparison Between Spiral CCT with Iterative Image Reconstruction and Z-axis Automated Tube Current Modulation and Sequential CCT

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2016 Aug 10
PMID 27504476
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To prospectively evaluate image quality and organ-specific-radiation dose of spiral cranial CT (cCT) combined with automated tube current modulation (ATCM) and iterative image reconstruction (IR) in comparison to sequential tilted cCT reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) without ATCM.

Methods: 31 patients with a previous performed tilted non-contrast enhanced sequential cCT aquisition on a 4-slice CT system with only FBP reconstruction and no ATCM were prospectively enrolled in this study for a clinical indicated cCT scan. All spiral cCT examinations were performed on a 3rd generation dual-source CT system using ATCM in z-axis direction. Images were reconstructed using both, FBP and IR (level 1-5). A Monte-Carlo-simulation-based analysis was used to compare organ-specific-radiation dose. Subjective image quality for various anatomic structures was evaluated using a 4-point Likert-scale and objective image quality was evaluated by comparing signal-to-noise ratios (SNR).

Results: Spiral cCT led to a significantly lower (p < 0.05) organ-specific-radiation dose in all targets including eye lense. Subjective image quality of spiral cCT datasets with an IR reconstruction level 5 was rated significantly higher compared to the sequential cCT acquisitions (p < 0.0001). Consecutive mean SNR was significantly higher in all spiral datasets (FBP, IR 1-5) when compared to sequential cCT with a mean SNR improvement of 44.77% (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Spiral cCT combined with ATCM and IR allows for significant-radiation dose reduction including a reduce eye lens organ-dose when compared to a tilted sequential cCT while improving subjective and objective image quality.

Citing Articles

Cervical Selective Nerve Root Block: Three-dimensional Puncture Planning With Dyna-CT Is Superior to Conventional CT-guidance in an Model.

Schneider S, Kerl H, Freundt M, Herrmann K, Groden C, Maros M In Vivo. 2025; 39(2):713-723.

PMID: 40010983 PMC: 11884481. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13875.


Deep learning assisted differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma from focal liver lesions: choice of four-phase and three-phase CT imaging protocol.

Shi W, Kuang S, Cao S, Hu B, Xie S, Chen S Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020; 45(9):2688-2697.

PMID: 32232524 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02485-8.


Radiation dose and image quality in intraoperative CT (iCT) angiography of the brain with stereotactic head frames.

Forbrig R, Geyer L, Stahl R, Thorsteinsdottir J, Schichor C, Kreth F Eur Radiol. 2019; 29(6):2859-2867.

PMID: 30635759 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5930-0.


Automatic tube potential selection with tube current modulation in coronary CT angiography: Can it achieve consistent image quality among various individuals?.

Wang X, Zhu X, Zhu Y, Liu W, Yang X, Huang W Exp Ther Med. 2018; 16(1):253-259.

PMID: 29896246 PMC: 5995055. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.6158.


Improved Peritoneal Cavity and Abdominal Organ Imaging Using a Biphasic Contrast Agent Protocol and Spectral Photon Counting Computed Tomography K-Edge Imaging.

Si-Mohamed S, Thivolet A, Bonnot P, Bar-Ness D, Kepenekian V, Cormode D Invest Radiol. 2018; 53(10):629-639.

PMID: 29794948 PMC: 6291259. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000483.

References
1.
Singh S, Kalra M, Hsieh J, Licato P, Do S, Pien H . Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Radiology. 2010; 257(2):373-83. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10092212. View

2.
Kalender W, Polacin A . Physical performance characteristics of spiral CT scanning. Med Phys. 1991; 18(5):910-5. DOI: 10.1118/1.596607. View

3.
Buhk J, Laqmani A, von Schultzendorff H, Hammerle D, Sehner S, Adam G . Intraindividual evaluation of the influence of iterative reconstruction and filter kernel on subjective and objective image quality in computed tomography of the brain. Rofo. 2013; 185(8):741-8. DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1335937. View

4.
Notohamiprodjo S, Deak Z, Meurer F, Maertz F, Mueck F, Geyer L . Image quality of iterative reconstruction in cranial CT imaging: comparison of model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR). Eur Radiol. 2014; 25(1):140-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3374-8. View

5.
Becker H, Augart D, Karpitschka M, Ulzheimer S, Bamberg F, Morhard D . Radiation exposure and image quality of normal computed tomography brain images acquired with automated and organ-based tube current modulation multiband filtering and iterative reconstruction. Invest Radiol. 2012; 47(3):202-7. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31823a86d5. View