» Articles » PMID: 27500148

Nutrition Assessment and Its Effect on Various Clinical Variables Among Patients Undergoing Liver Transplant

Overview
Date 2016 Aug 9
PMID 27500148
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Malnutrition is highly prevalent in patients undergoing liver transplantation and has been associated to various clinical variables and outcome of the surgery.

Methods: We recruited 54 adult patients undergoing living donor liver transplant (LT) as study sample. Nutrition assessment was performed by body mass index (BMI), BMI for ascites, albumin, subjective global assessment (SGA) and anthropometry [mid upper arm circumference (MUAC), mid arm muscle circumference (MAMC), and triceps skin-fold (TSF)], Hand Grip strength, and phase angle of the body. Prevalence and comparison of malnutrition was performed with various clinical variables: aetiology, Child Turcotte Pugh scores and model for end stage liver disease (ESLD) grades, degree of ascites, blood product usage, blood loss during the surgery, mortality, days [intensive care unit (ICU), Ventilator and Hospital], and Bio-impedance analysis [weight, fat mass, fat free mass (FFM), muscle mass and body fat%].

Results: Assessment of nutrition status represents a major challenge because of complications like fluid retention, hypoalbuminemia and hypoproteinemia. Different nutrition assessment tools show great disparity in the level of malnutrition among ESLD patients. In the present study recipient nutrition status evaluation by different nutrition assessment tools used showed malnutrition ranging from 3.7% to 100%. BMI and anthropometric measurements showed lower prevalence of malnutrition than phase angle and SGA whereas hand grip strength showed 100% malnutrition. Agreement among nutrition assessment methods showed moderate agreement (κ=0.444) of SGA with phase angle of the body. Malnutrition by different assessment tools was significantly associated to various clinical variables except MELD and days (ICU, Ventilator and Hospital). SGA was significantly (P<0.05) associated to majority of the clinical variables like aetiology, child Turcotte Pugh grades, degree of ascites, blood product usage, blood loss during the surgery, BIA (fat mass, FFM, muscle mass and body fat%).

Conclusions: The different nutrition assessment tools showed great variability of results. SGA showed moderate agreement with phase angle of the body and was associated with various clinical and prognostic variables of liver transplantation.

Citing Articles

Prognostic role of bioelectrical impedance phase angle for critically ill patients: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

Zheng W, Zhao Y, Yao Y, Huang H Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 9:1059747.

PMID: 36698812 PMC: 9868673. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1059747.


Sarcopenia in Children with Solid Organ Tumors: An Instrumental Era.

Ritz A, Lurz E, Berger M Cells. 2022; 11(8).

PMID: 35455957 PMC: 9024674. DOI: 10.3390/cells11081278.


Utility of Preoperative Computed Tomography-Based Body Metrics in Relation to Postoperative Complications in Pediatric Liver Transplantation Recipients.

Verhagen M, Levolger S, Hulshoff J, Werner M, van der Doef H, Viddeleer A Liver Transpl. 2021; 27(12):1779-1787.

PMID: 34118133 PMC: 9291866. DOI: 10.1002/lt.26205.


Association of a novel mutation in a family with autosomal dominant polycystic liver disease.

Wang J, Yang H, Guo R, Sang X, Mao Y Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9(2):120.

PMID: 33569422 PMC: 7867901. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-3318.


Nutrition Management of Acute Postliver Transplant Recipients.

Bakshi N, Singh K Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019; 22(11):773-780.

PMID: 30598563 PMC: 6259442. DOI: 10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_227_18.


References
1.
Fernandes S, Bassani L, Nunes F, Deutrich Aydos M, Alves A, Marroni C . Nutritional assessment in patients with cirrhosis. Arq Gastroenterol. 2012; 49(1):19-27. DOI: 10.1590/s0004-28032012000100005. View

2.
. Nutritional status in cirrhosis. Italian Multicentre Cooperative Project on Nutrition in Liver Cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 1994; 21(3):317-25. View

3.
Muller M, Lautz H, Plogmann B, Burger M, Korber J, Schmidt F . Energy expenditure and substrate oxidation in patients with cirrhosis: the impact of cause, clinical staging and nutritional state. Hepatology. 1992; 15(5):782-94. DOI: 10.1002/hep.1840150507. View

4.
Pirlich M, Schutz T, Spachos T, Ertl S, Weiss M, Lochs H . Bioelectrical impedance analysis is a useful bedside technique to assess malnutrition in cirrhotic patients with and without ascites. Hepatology. 2000; 32(6):1208-15. DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2000.20524. View

5.
Shaw Jr B, Wood R, Gordon R, Iwatsuki S, Gillquist W, Starzl T . Influence of selected patient variables and operative blood loss on six-month survival following liver transplantation. Semin Liver Dis. 1985; 5(4):385-93. PMC: 3022507. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1040637. View