» Articles » PMID: 27493936

Comparative Brain and Central Nervous System Tumor Incidence and Survival Between the United States and Taiwan Based on Population-Based Registry

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2016 Aug 6
PMID 27493936
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Reasons for worldwide variability in the burden of primary malignant brain and central nervous system (CNS) tumors remain unclear. This study compares the incidence and survival of malignant brain and CNS tumors by selected histologic types between the United States (US) and Taiwan.

Methods: Data from 2002 to 2010 were selected from two population-based cancer registries for primary malignant brain and CNS tumors: the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States and the Taiwan Cancer Registry. Two registries had similar process of collecting patients with malignant brain tumor, and the quality of two registries was comparative. The age-adjusted incidence rate (IR), IR ratio, and survival by histological types, age, and gender were used to study regional differences.

Results: The overall age-adjusted IRs were 5.91 per 100,000 in the US and 2.68 per 100,000 in Taiwan. The most common histologic type for both countries was glioblastoma (GBM) with a 12.9% higher proportion in the US than in Taiwan. GBM had the lowest survival rate of any histology in both countries (US 1-year survival rate = 37.5%; Taiwan 1-year survival rate = 50.3%). The second largest group was astrocytoma, excluding GBM and anaplastic astrocytoma, with the distribution being slightly higher in Taiwan than in the US.

Conclusion: Our findings revealed differences by histological type and grade of primary malignant brain and CNS tumors between two sites.

Citing Articles

F-FET PET/CT can aid in diagnosing patients with indeterminate MRI findings for brain tumors: a prospective study.

Chan S, Chiu T, Ng S, Kao H, Tsai S, Liu S Ann Nucl Med. 2024; .

PMID: 39589672 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-024-02005-4.


Correlation Between CT Density, Incidence, Mortality, and Mortality-to-Incidence Ratio in Central Nervous System Cancers: An Exploratory Analysis of Global Data.

Yang T, Chang Y, Yu C, Sung W, Lee T In Vivo. 2024; 38(4):2024-2030.

PMID: 38936918 PMC: 11215593. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13660.


The role of adjuvant radiotherapy for intracranial malignant meningiomas: analysis of a nationwide database.

Ho C, Shieh L, Lin C, Guo H, Ho Y, Ho S J Neurooncol. 2024; 169(2):369-378.

PMID: 38814405 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04720-4.


Initial Treatment of IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma in Adults Older Than 70 Years.

Bao J, Pan Z, Wei S Cureus. 2023; 15(10):e47602.

PMID: 37881322 PMC: 10597738. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47602.


Polymorphism at codon 31 of CDKN1A (p21) as a predictive factor for bevacizumab therapy in glioblastoma multiforme.

Cheng W, Shen C, Liang Y, Chiao M, Yang Y, Hsieh W BMC Cancer. 2023; 23(1):886.

PMID: 37730565 PMC: 10510274. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11400-5.


References
1.
Bondy M, Scheurer M, Malmer B, Barnholtz-Sloan J, Davis F, Ilyasova D . Brain tumor epidemiology: consensus from the Brain Tumor Epidemiology Consortium. Cancer. 2008; 113(7 Suppl):1953-68. PMC: 2861559. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23741. View

2.
Blitshteyn S, Crook J, Jaeckle K . Is there an association between meningioma and hormone replacement therapy?. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(2):279-82. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.2133. View

3.
Mathew R, OKane R, Parslow R, Stiller C, Kenny T, Picton S . Comparison of survival between the UK and US after surgery for most common pediatric CNS tumors. Neuro Oncol. 2014; 16(8):1137-45. PMC: 4096177. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nou056. View

4.
Andersen L, Friis S, Hallas J, Ravn P, Schroder H, Gaist D . Hormone replacement therapy increases the risk of cranial meningioma. Eur J Cancer. 2013; 49(15):3303-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.05.026. View

5.
Barnholtz-Sloan J, Severson R, Stanton B, Hamre M, Sloan A . Pediatric brain tumors in non-Hispanics, Hispanics, African Americans and Asians: differences in survival after diagnosis. Cancer Causes Control. 2005; 16(5):587-92. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-004-7843-2. View