» Articles » PMID: 27493500

Structural and Mutation Studies of Two DNA Demethylation Related Glycosylases: MBD4 and TDG

Overview
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2016 Aug 6
PMID 27493500
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two mammalian DNA glycosylases, methyl-CpG binding domain protein 4 (MBD4) and thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG), are involved in active DNA demethylation via the base excision repair pathway. Both MBD4 and TDG excise the mismatch base from G:X, where X is uracil, thymine, and 5-hydroxymethyluracil (5hmU). In addition, TDG excises 5mC oxidized bases i.e. when X is 5-formylcytosine (5fC), and 5-carboxylcytosine (5caC) not 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC). A MBD4 inactive mutant and substrate crystal structure clearly explains how MBD4 glycosylase discriminates substrates: 5mC are not able to be directly excised, but a deamination process from 5mC to thymine is required. On the other hand, TDG is much more complicated; in this instance, crystal structures show that TDG recognizes G:X mismatch DNA containing DNA and G:5caC containing DNA from the minor groove of DNA, which suggested that TDG might recognize 5mC oxidized product 5caC like mismatch DNA. In mutation studies, a N157D mutation results in a more 5caC specific glycosylase, and a N191A mutation inhibits 5caC activity while that when X=5fC or T remains. Here I revisit the recent MBD4 glycos ylase domain co-crystal structures with DNA, as well as TDG glycosylase domain co-crystal structures with DNA in conjunction with its mutation studies.

Citing Articles

Detection of Genomic Uracil Patterns.

Bekesi A, Holub E, Palinkas H, Vertessy B Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(8).

PMID: 33918885 PMC: 8070346. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22083902.


Uncovering universal rules governing the selectivity of the archetypal DNA glycosylase TDG.

Dodd T, Yan C, Kossmann B, Martin K, Ivanov I Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(23):5974-5979.

PMID: 29784784 PMC: 6003370. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1803323115.


Excision of the doubly methylated base ,5-dimethylcytosine from DNA by Nei and Fpg proteins.

Alexeeva M, Guragain P, Tesfahun A, Tomkuviene M, Arshad A, Gerasimaite R Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018; 373(1748).

PMID: 29685966 PMC: 5915725. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0337.

References
1.
Morgan H, Dean W, Coker H, Reik W, Petersen-Mahrt S . Activation-induced cytidine deaminase deaminates 5-methylcytosine in DNA and is expressed in pluripotent tissues: implications for epigenetic reprogramming. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279(50):52353-60. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M407695200. View

2.
Burdzy A, Noyes K, Valinluck V, Sowers L . Synthesis of stable-isotope enriched 5-methylpyrimidines and their use as probes of base reactivity in DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002; 30(18):4068-74. PMC: 137105. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkf520. View

3.
Hu L, Li Z, Cheng J, Rao Q, Gong W, Liu M . Crystal structure of TET2-DNA complex: insight into TET-mediated 5mC oxidation. Cell. 2013; 155(7):1545-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.020. View

4.
Maiti A, Michelson A, Armwood C, Lee J, Drohat A . Divergent mechanisms for enzymatic excision of 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine from DNA. J Am Chem Soc. 2013; 135(42):15813-22. PMC: 3930231. DOI: 10.1021/ja406444x. View

5.
Wu P, Qiu C, Sohail A, Zhang X, Bhagwat A, Cheng X . Mismatch repair in methylated DNA. Structure and activity of the mismatch-specific thymine glycosylase domain of methyl-CpG-binding protein MBD4. J Biol Chem. 2002; 278(7):5285-91. PMC: 2764232. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M210884200. View