» Articles » PMID: 27492876

Detecting the Collapse of Cooperation in Evolving Networks

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2016 Aug 6
PMID 27492876
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The sustainability of biological, social, economic and ecological communities is often determined by the outcome of social conflicts between cooperative and selfish individuals (cheaters). Cheaters avoid the cost of contributing to the community and can occasionally spread in the population leading to the complete collapse of cooperation. Although such collapse often unfolds unexpectedly, it is unclear whether one can detect the risk of cheater's invasions and loss of cooperation in an evolving community. Here, we combine dynamical networks and evolutionary game theory to study the abrupt loss of cooperation with tools for studying critical transitions. We estimate the risk of cooperation collapse following the introduction of a single cheater under gradually changing conditions. We observe an increase in the average time it takes for cheaters to be eliminated from the community as the risk of collapse increases. We argue that such slow system response resembles slowing down in recovery rates prior to a critical transition. In addition, we show how changes in community structure reflect the risk of cooperation collapse. We find that these changes strongly depend on the mechanism that governs how cheaters evolve in the community. Our results highlight novel directions for detecting abrupt transitions in evolving networks.

Citing Articles

Social Diversification Driven by Mobile Genetic Elements.

Weltzer M, Wall D Genes (Basel). 2023; 14(3).

PMID: 36980919 PMC: 10047993. DOI: 10.3390/genes14030648.


Impact of direct physical association and motility on fitness of a synthetic interkingdom microbial community.

Scarinci G, Sourjik V ISME J. 2022; 17(3):371-381.

PMID: 36566339 PMC: 9938286. DOI: 10.1038/s41396-022-01352-2.


Strategically positioning cooperators can facilitate the contagion of cooperation.

Yang G, Cavaliere M, Zhu C, Perc M Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):1127.

PMID: 33441930 PMC: 7806618. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80770-8.


Identification of influential invaders in evolutionary populations.

Yang G, Benko T, Cavaliere M, Huang J, Perc M Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):7305.

PMID: 31086258 PMC: 6514010. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-43853-9.


Effects of motion in structured populations.

Krieger M, McAvoy A, Nowak M J R Soc Interface. 2017; 14(135).

PMID: 28978749 PMC: 5665834. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0509.


References
1.
Rainey P, Rainey K . Evolution of cooperation and conflict in experimental bacterial populations. Nature. 2003; 425(6953):72-4. DOI: 10.1038/nature01906. View

2.
Travisano M, Velicer G . Strategies of microbial cheater control. Trends Microbiol. 2004; 12(2):72-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2003.12.009. View

3.
Lieberman E, Hauert C, Nowak M . Evolutionary dynamics on graphs. Nature. 2005; 433(7023):312-6. DOI: 10.1038/nature03204. View

4.
Drake J . Population effects of increased climate variation. Proc Biol Sci. 2005; 272(1574):1823-7. PMC: 1559868. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3148. View

5.
Ohtsuki H, Hauert C, Lieberman E, Nowak M . A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks. Nature. 2006; 441(7092):502-5. PMC: 2430087. DOI: 10.1038/nature04605. View