» Articles » PMID: 27489556

Alternative Growth and Defensive Strategies Reveal Potential and Gender Specific Trade-Offs in Dioecious Plants Salix Paraplesia to Nutrient Availability

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2016 Aug 5
PMID 27489556
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Population sex ratios of many dioecious plants in nature are biased. This may be attributed to sexually different resource demands and adaptive capacity. In male-biasedPopulus, males often display stronger physiological adaptation than females. Interestingly, Populus and Salix, belonging to Salicaceae, display an opposite biased sex ratio, especially in nutrient-poor environmental conditions. Do female willows have a greater tolerance to nutrient deficiency than males? In this study, we investigated the growth and defensive strategies of Salix paraplesia cuttings, which were grown with high and low soil fertility for about 140 days over one growing season. Results suggest that different strategies for biomass allocation may result in sexually different defense capacities and trade-offs between growth and defense. Females are likely to adopt radical strategies, overdrawing on available resources to satisfy both growth and defense, which seems to be more like a gamble compared with males. It is also suggested that females may have an extra mechanism to compensate for the investment in growth under nutrient-poor conditions. In summary, the results may help focus restoration efforts on sex selection such that a moderate increase in female willow quantity could increase the resistance and resilience of willow populations to early sporadic desertification.

Citing Articles

Plant sex influences on riparian communities and ecosystems.

Scheuerell R, LeRoy C Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(7):e10308.

PMID: 37449021 PMC: 10337289. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10308.


females exhibit more resistance against wind erosion than males under aeolian environment.

Ma S, Liu G, Wang L, Liu G, Xu X Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:1053741.

PMID: 36452112 PMC: 9702805. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1053741.


A Selection of Reliable Reference Genes for Gene Expression Analysis in the Female and Male Flowers of .

Zhou F, Chen Y, Wu H, Yin T Plants (Basel). 2022; 11(5).

PMID: 35270117 PMC: 8912643. DOI: 10.3390/plants11050647.


Sex-specific differences in : essential oil yield, growth-defence conflict and population sex ratio.

Marko G, Nemeth I, Gyuricza V, Altbacker V AoB Plants. 2021; 13(3):plab021.

PMID: 34122786 PMC: 8192244. DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plab021.


Sex-biased genes and metabolites explain morphologically sexual dimorphism and reproductive costs in Salix paraplesia catkins.

Cai Z, Yang C, Liao J, Song H, Zhang S Hortic Res. 2021; 8(1):125.

PMID: 34059667 PMC: 8166972. DOI: 10.1038/s41438-021-00566-3.


References
1.
Renner S . The relative and absolute frequencies of angiosperm sexual systems: dioecy, monoecy, gynodioecy, and an updated online database. Am J Bot. 2014; 101(10):1588-96. DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1400196. View

2.
Montesinos D, Villar-Salvador P, Garcia-Fayos P, Verdu M . Genders in Juniperus thurifera have different functional responses to variations in nutrient availability. New Phytol. 2011; 193(3):705-712. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03982.x. View

3.
Sanchez-Vilas J, Bermudez R, Retuerto R . Soil water content and patterns of allocation to below- and above-ground biomass in the sexes of the subdioecious plant Honckenya peploides. Ann Bot. 2012; 110(4):839-48. PMC: 3423814. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcs157. View

4.
Obeso J . The costs of reproduction in plants. New Phytol. 2021; 155(3):321-348. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00477.x. View

5.
Hultine K, Burtch K, Ehleringer J . Gender specific patterns of carbon uptake and water use in a dominant riparian tree species exposed to a warming climate. Glob Chang Biol. 2013; 19(11):3390-405. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12230. View