» Articles » PMID: 27486576

Quantifying Dynamic Changes in Plantar Pressure Gradient in Diabetics with Peripheral Neuropathy

Overview
Date 2016 Aug 4
PMID 27486576
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers remain one of the most serious complications of diabetes. Peak plantar pressure (PPP) and peak pressure gradient (PPG) during walking have been shown to be associated with the development of diabetic foot ulcers. To gain further insight into the mechanical etiology of diabetic foot ulcers, examination of the pressure gradient angle (PGA) has been recently proposed. The PGA quantifies directional variation or orientation of the pressure gradient during walking and provides a measure of whether pressure gradient patterns are concentrated or dispersed along the plantar surface. We hypothesized that diabetics at risk of foot ulceration would have smaller PGA in key plantar regions, suggesting less movement of the pressure gradient over time. A total of 27 participants were studied, including 19 diabetics with peripheral neuropathy and 8 non-diabetic control subjects. A foot pressure measurement system was used to measure plantar pressures during walking. PPP, PPG, and PGA were calculated for four foot regions - first toe (T1), first metatarsal head (M1), second metatarsal head (M2), and heel (HL). Consistent with prior studies, PPP and PPG were significantly larger in the diabetic group compared with non-diabetic controls in the T1 and M1 regions, but not M2 or HL. For example, PPP was 165% (P = 0.02) and PPG was 214% (P < 0.001) larger in T1. PGA was found to be significantly smaller in the diabetic group in T1 (46%, P = 0.04), suggesting a more concentrated pressure gradient pattern under the toe. The proposed PGA may improve our understanding of the role of pressure gradient on the risk of diabetic foot ulcers.

Citing Articles

Sarcopenia in the foot on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with diabetes mellitus - a systematic review.

Ahmad M, Mohamed A, Amiras D, Siracusa F, Shalhoub J, Davies A Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024; 10(1):31.

PMID: 39449093 PMC: 11515346. DOI: 10.1186/s40842-024-00194-5.


Effect of different inner pressures of air insoles and walking durations on plantar pressure time integral.

Ramadhan G, Haris F, Jan Y, Liau B, Chang W, Tai C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):19272.

PMID: 39164374 PMC: 11336220. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-70312-x.


Advancements in diabetic foot insoles: a comprehensive review of design, manufacturing, and performance evaluation.

Ren Y, Wang H, Song X, Wu Y, Lyu Y, Zeng W Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1394758.

PMID: 39076210 PMC: 11284111. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1394758.


In-shoe plantar pressure measurement technologies for the diabetic foot: A systematic review.

Castro-Martins P, Marques A, Coelho L, Vaz M, Baptista J Heliyon. 2024; 10(9):e29672.

PMID: 38699042 PMC: 11064085. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29672.


A method for automated masking and plantar pressure analysis using segmented computed tomography scans.

Brady L, Wukelic C, Ledoux W Gait Posture. 2024; 111:92-98.

PMID: 38657477 PMC: 11127777. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.04.015.


References
1.
Atlas E, Yizhar Z, Khamis S, Slomka N, Hayek S, Gefen A . Utilization of the foot load monitor for evaluating deep plantar tissue stresses in patients with diabetes: proof-of-concept studies. Gait Posture. 2008; 29(3):377-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.10.055. View

2.
Cavanagh P, Sims Jr D, SANDERS L . Body mass is a poor predictor of peak plantar pressure in diabetic men. Diabetes Care. 1991; 14(8):750-5. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.14.8.750. View

3.
Zheng Y, Choi Y, Wong K, Chan S, Mak A . Biomechanical assessment of plantar foot tissue in diabetic patients using an ultrasound indentation system. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000; 26(3):451-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(99)00163-5. View

4.
Bus S . Priorities in offloading the diabetic foot. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012; 28 Suppl 1:54-9. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.2240. View

5.
Lott D, Zou D, Mueller M . Pressure gradient and subsurface shear stress on the neuropathic forefoot. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2007; 23(3):342-8. PMC: 2387244. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.10.005. View