» Articles » PMID: 27485512

Making Quality Health Websites a National Public Health Priority: Toward Quality Standards

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2016 Aug 4
PMID 27485512
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Most US adults have limited health literacy skills. They struggle to understand complex health information and services and to make informed health decisions. The Internet has quickly become one of the most popular places for people to search for information about their health, thereby making access to quality information on the Web a priority. However, there are no standardized criteria for evaluating Web-based health information. Every 10 years, the US Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (ODPHP) develops a set of measurable objectives for improving the health of the nation over the coming decade, known as Healthy People. There are two objectives in Healthy People 2020 related to website quality. The first is objective Health Communication and Health Information Technology (HC/HIT) 8.1: increase the proportion of health-related websites that meet 3 or more evaluation criteria for disclosing information that can be used to assess information reliability. The second is objective HC/HIT-8.2: increase the proportion of health-related websites that follow established usability principles.

Objective: The ODPHP conducted a nationwide assessment of the quality of Web-based health information using the Healthy People 2020 objectives. The ODPHP aimed to establish (1) a standardized approach to defining and measuring the quality of health websites; (2) benchmarks for measurement; (3) baseline data points to capture the current status of website quality; and (4) targets to drive improvement.

Methods: The ODPHP developed the National Quality Health Website Survey instrument to assess the quality of health-related websites. The ODPHP used this survey to review 100 top-ranked health-related websites in order to set baseline data points for these two objectives. The ODPHP then set targets to drive improvement by 2020.

Results: This study reviewed 100 health-related websites. For objective HC/HIT-8.1, a total of 58 out of 100 (58.0%) websites met 3 or more out of 6 reliability criteria. For objective HC/HIT-8.2, a total of 42 out of 100 (42.0%) websites followed 10 or more out of 19 established usability principles. On the basis of these baseline data points, ODPHP set targets for the year 2020 that meet the minimal statistical significance-increasing objective HC/HIT-8.1 data point to 70.5% and objective HC/HIT-8.2 data point to 55.7%.

Conclusions: This research is a critical first step in evaluating the quality of Web-based health information. The criteria proposed by ODPHP provide methods to assess website quality for professionals designing, developing, and managing health-related websites. The criteria, baseline data, and targets are valuable tools for driving quality improvement.

Citing Articles

Designing visual hierarchies for the communication of health data.

Saw J, Gatzke L J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024; 31(11):2722-2729.

PMID: 39088568 PMC: 11491599. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocae175.


Bone health education in individuals with spinal cord injury or disease-the Bare Bones Podcast Series: plan it, produce it, post it!.

Craven B, Kaiser A, Blencowe L, Jervis-Rademeyer H, Boag L, Murphy W Front Rehabil Sci. 2024; 5:1340881.

PMID: 39082051 PMC: 11286568. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1340881.


High-Quality eHealth Websites for Information on Endometriosis: Systematic Search.

Sirohi D, Ng C, Bidargaddi N, Slater H, Parker M, Hull M J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e48243.

PMID: 38198205 PMC: 10809066. DOI: 10.2196/48243.


Improving the Quality of Healthcare Provision Regarding HPV Immunization for Women with CIN2+ Lesions: The Experience of the Veneto Region in Italy.

de Polo A, Tonon M, Da Re F, Rosafio S, Narne E, Gentili D Vaccines (Basel). 2023; 11(4).

PMID: 37112669 PMC: 10145840. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11040757.


Evaluation of the quality and accuracy of breast cancer knowledge among persian language websites.

Alipour S, Nikooei S, Hosseinpour R, Yavari Barhaghtalab M BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):1560.

PMID: 36539766 PMC: 9768907. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08966-4.


References
1.
Kim P, Eng T, Deering M, Maxfield A . Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review. BMJ. 1999; 318(7184):647-9. PMC: 27772. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.318.7184.647. View

2.
Agree E, King A, Castro C, Wiley A, Borzekowski D . "It's got to be on this page": age and cognitive style in a study of online health information seeking. J Med Internet Res. 2015; 17(3):e79. PMC: 4389106. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3352. View

3.
Coulter A, Ellins J . Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. BMJ. 2007; 335(7609):24-7. PMC: 1910640. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39246.581169.80. View

4.
Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O . Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002; 287(20):2691-700. DOI: 10.1001/jama.287.20.2691. View

5.
Fiksdal A, Kumbamu A, Jadhav A, Cocos C, Nelsen L, Pathak J . Evaluating the process of online health information searching: a qualitative approach to exploring consumer perspectives. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16(10):e224. PMC: 4285658. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3341. View